References R-33Von Raffler-Engel, W. (1983). The perception of nonverbal be-
havior in the career interview. Philadelphia: Benjamin.
Voorveld, H. A. M., & van der Goot, M. (2013). Age differences
in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcast-
ing & Electronic Media, 57(3), 392–408. doi:http://dx.doi
.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.816709
Voss, B. (2010, December 22). Sibling revelry. TheAdvocate.com.
Retrieved from http://www.advocate.com/Arts_and_
Entertainment/Television/Sibling_Revelry
Vrij, A. (2006). Nonverbal communication and deception. In V.
Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of
nonverbal communication (pp. 341–360). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications.
Wade, N. (2010, January 12). Deciphering the chatter of mon-
keys and chimps. The New York Times, p. D1.
Wailgum, T. (2008, June 8). How Steve Jobs beats presenta-
tion panic. CIO.com. Retrieved from http://www.cio.com/
article/596271/How_Steve_Jobs_Beats_Presentation_Panic
Waldman, K. (2014, January 7). The Bechdel test sets the bar
too low. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/blogs/
xx_factor/2014/01/07/the_bechdel_test_needs_an_update_
we_ve_set_the_bar_for_female_representation.html
Waldron, V. R., & Applegate, J. A. (1998). Effects of tactic
similarity on social attraction and persuasiveness in
dyadic verbal disagreements. Communication Reports, 11,
155–166.
Waldron, V. R. , & Kelley, D. L. (2005). Forgiving communi-
cation as a response to relational transgressions. Journal of
Social and Personal Relationships, 22 , 723–742.
Wallenfelsz, K. P., & Hample, D. (2010). The role of taking
conflict personally in imagined interactions about conflict.
Southern Communication Journal, 75(5), 471–487.
Wallis, C. (2006, March 27). The multitasking generation.
Time, pp. 48–55.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication:
Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction.
Communication Research, 23, 3–43.
Walther, J. B. (2006). Nonverbal dynamics in computer-
mediated communication, or: :-( and the net :-(‘s with you,
:-) and you :-) alone. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson
(Eds.), Handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 461–479).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues
filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and rela-
tionships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook
of interpersonal communication (pp. 529–563). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Walther, J. B., & Ramirez, A., Jr. (2009). New technologies and
new directions in online relating. In S. W. Smith & S. R.
Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication
research (pp. 264–284). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publica-
tions.
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S-Y., Westerman, D.,
& Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance andbehavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we
known by the company we keep? Human Communication
Research, 34 (1), 28–49.
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Tong, S. T., Carr, C. T.,
& Atkin, C. K. (2010). Effects of interpersonal goals on
inadvertent intrapersonal influence in computer-mediated
communication. Human Communication Research, 36 (3),
323–347.
Waltman, M., & Haas, J. (2011). The communication of hate.
New York: Peter Lang.
Wang, G., & Liu, Z. (2010). What collective? Collectivism and
relationalism from a Chinese perspective. Chinese Journal of
Communication, 3 (1), 42–63.
Wanzer, M., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Gruber, K. (2004).
Perceptions of health care providers’ communication:
Relationships between patient-centered communication
and satisfaction. Health Communication, 16 (3), 363–383.
Ward, C. C., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2004). Relation of shyness with
aspects of online relationship involvement. Journal of Social
and Personal Relationships, 21, 611–623.
Wasserman, B., & Weseley, A. (2009). ¿Qué? Quoi? Do lan-
guages with grammatical gender promote sexist attitudes?
Sex Roles, 61 (9/10), 634–643.
Waters, S., & Ackerman, J. (2011). Exploring privacy manage-
ment on facebook: Motivations and perceived consequences
of voluntary disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Com-
munication, 17 (1), 101–115.
Watson, K., Barker, L., & Weaver, J. (1995). The listening styles
profile (LSP-16): Development and validation of an instru-
ment to assess four listening styles. lnternational Journal of
Listening, 9, 1–13.
Watts, D. J. (2011). Everything is obvious once you know the
answer: How common sense fails us. New York: Crown Pub-
lishing Group.
Way, N. (2011). Deep secrets: Boys’ friendships and the crisis of
connection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webster, M. J., & Driskell, J. E., Jr. (1978). Status generaliza-
tion: A review of some new data. American Sociological
Review, 42, 220–236.
Webster, M. J., & Driskell, J. E., Jr. (1983). Beauty as status.
American Journal of Sociology, 89, 140–165.
Wecker, C. (2012). Slide presentations as speech suppressors:
When and why learners miss oral information. Computers
and Education, 59(2), 260–273.
Weger, H., Jr., Castle, G. R., & Emmett, M. C. (2010). Ac-
tive listening in peer interviews: The influence of message
paraphrasing on perceptions of listening skill. International
Journal of Listening, 24 (1), 34–49.
Weisz, C., & Wood, L. F. (2005). Social identity support and
friendship outcomes: A longitudinal study predicting who
will be friends and best friends 4 years later. Journal of Social
and Personal Relationships, 22, 416–432.
Welch, B. A., Mossholder, K. W., Stell, R. P., & Bennett, N.
(1998). Does work group cohesiveness affect individuals’21_OHA_45766_Ref_R_1_36.indd R-3321_OHA_45766_Ref_R_1_36.indd R-33 13/10/14 5:41 PM13/10/14 5:41 PM