162Originsposes.’’12TheRomaninfluenceonIslamicatecivilizationisboththemost obscure andthe most
disputed.13In
myview, theRoman
Empirehad
negligibledirectinfluenceonIslambut
afairindirect
impactthroughByzantium.TheByzantines,how-ever,employed
slavesfor
militarypurposesfarlessoftenthantheRomanshad. One
majorinstancedatesfromthetimeofTiberius
(r.578-82):"Tiberius
begancautiouslytolaythe
foun-dationofanew
system,byaddingto
hishouseholdtroopsacorpsoffifteenthousandheathenslaves,whomhe
purchasedand
disciplined.TMTheauthorofthisaccount,
GeorgeFinlay,explicitlycompares
those
troopstotheJanissaries
andtheem-peror’scircumstancestothoseoftheAbbasid
caliphswhofirstintroduced
militaryslavery,a5Inlater
Byzantium,therewerenoindicationsofslaves
servingassoldiers,
thoughaservileclassofyouthsperformedauxiliary
servicesand
did
occasionallyfight?Overall,it
appearsthatthe
ByzantinesusedslavesinwarfarefarlessoftenthantheRomansandinthis
respectdidnotcontributemuchtotheIslamicateinstitution.IranIran
mayhave
providedtheMuslimswithamodelfor
trainingslaves,
thoughdefiniteinformationonthis
topicisscant? Weshall discuss hereonlythe
SoghdianandSasanian
cases,foralthough
similar
training mayhaveexisted elsewhere, thosecasesareevenmoreobscure?It
appearsthatthe
Soghdiansgatheredchildrentotrainas12.Rouland,
pp.24-25.
Emphasisinthe
original.13.TheextensiveinfluenceofRomeonIslamisCrone’sspecialinterest
in"Mawilf,"
pp.189-215.14.
GeorgeFinlay,A
History
ofGreece, 7 vol.,2ded.
(Oxford,1877),1:301.15.Ibid.,1:301,1.16.K6pstein,p.113;
Vryonis,"ByzantineandTurkish,"
pp.141-42;Cahen,"BodyPolitic,"p.
147.17.Ayalon,"PreliminaryRemarks,"p.47,stressesthe
importanceoftheIra-nianelement.- havebeenunableto
verify
thecasualmentionoflargeslavearmiesinAchaemenidtimes
(e.g.H.Inalcik,TheOttomanEmpire[London,1973],p.77).Richard
FryebelievesthattheSasanianrtak(page)"mayhavebeenaslaveandmayhavebeentrainedforwar"(conversationof 30 July1975).