HowMilitarySlaveryFirstOccurred 171Muslimsoutsidethetribalnetworkwho
occupiedpositions
oflowsocialstatus;all
experienced
dislocationandrelied
heavilyontheir
patrons
foraccesstothe
goodthingsinlife.
Despitelegaldifferences,fighting
mawlasofboth
typeshada
disjointedandvulnerable
standing;they
had
givenuptiestothesubjectpopulation
without
acquiringfirmnewonestothe
rulingcircles.Lacking
an
independentpowerbase,
mawlas
dependedheavilyontheirwarrior
patrons;
thebest
waytowinfavorwas
throughfaithfulserviceinwar.
Thataslavemawlalosthisties tohisown
peopleandhad
nonetotheArabiansexceptthrough
his
patronrequiresnoex-planation,sincethisalmost
alwayshappensin
slavery.But
whywasitalsothecaseforfreemawlas?Because
theyvoluntarily
gaveup
their
independenceinreturnfor
specifiedsocialand
economicbenefits.Freemawlaswere
usuallypersonsfromthemosthumblesocial
originswhohad
nothingtolosewhen
theywentovertoIslam.
52They
foundthatmereconversioninitselfbrought
themlittle;inordertogain
fromthis
act,mawlashad
toenter
militaryservice.Byattaching
themselves
tothe
societyoftherulers,indeed,theyhadmuch
togain.Howeverlowtheir
positionwithin that
society, becomingmawla to anArabian
soldier offered the
onlyroute of
escapefrom the subjectpopulation.Free mawlas
gainedthe
followingby enteringtheclientalrelationswithanArabian:inreturnfor
givingupcommunity,religion,and
independenceofaction,
theymadetheenormousleapfrom
subjectand
taxpayertosoldierand
tax-recipient.3Howeverfraught
with
risks,militaryserviceofferedthe
onlypath
foranon-Arabiantosharein
anywaythebenefits
enjoyedby
the
rulingelite.
Thoughtheynormallyreceivedless
paythanArabians54and hadalmostno
independentvoicein
establishingpolicy,mawlasstill
gainedbyjoiningthearmy.
Thefreemawlaenteredservice
voluntarily,butonce
in,hiscommitmentbecameirreversible; after
castinghislotwithanArabian,hecouldnot
gobackonhisconversionnorabandonhis52.Bulliet,
p.41.53.Crone,
p.102.54.Forsomereferenceson
this,see
Dixon,p.48 n.
115;al-eAli,at-Tanzrrndt,p.66 n.2;Abfi
eUbayd,pp.311,314.