HowMilitary
SlaveryFirstOccurred 193formationtodecideOnthe
significanceofal-H.akamb.Hishfim’s
measuresandto
judgewhetherornot
theyconstituteda
systemof
militaryslavery.If
so,his
mayhavethehonorof
precedingtheoneestablishedbyal-Ma’mfinand
al-MuCtas.im.137Wasitmerecoincidencethatthis
heavyrelianceonslavesinSpain
occurred
simultaneouslywiththeAbbasids’
developmentof
militaryslavery?Canitbeaccidentalthaia
systemunprece-dentedinhuman
historyoccurredintwo
placesatthesamemoment?Ithinknot.The
SpanishUmayyadsandtheAbbasids
sharedtwo
legacies:theIslamicateneed(for
marginalareasol-diers)andtheMarwanidanswer
(usingmarginalarea
soldiersinan unfree
way,as
mawlas).In combination, these elementsprompted
both
dynastiestorecruit
marginalareasoldiersasslaves.138The
simultaneityof
developmentsin
SpainandIran-Iraqcanhardly
be
coincidental;together,IslamicateneedandMarwanidprecedent
accountfortheinitial
developmentof
mil-itaryslavery.ConclusionThis
explanationforthe
originsof
militaryslaveryconfirmstheargument
forits Islamicaterationale
proposedin
chapter3.Briefly,thatrationalemaintains:(1)thatthe
impossibilityofat-tainingIslamic
publicidealscausedMuslimsubjectstorelin-quishtheirmililtaryrole;
(2)that
marginalarea
soldiersfilledthis
powervacuum;
(3)that
theybecame
rapidlyunreliable,creatingtheneedfor fresh
marginalareasoldiersanda
waytobind
them;(4)that
militaryslaverysupplieda
wayboth
toac-quireandtocontrolnew
marginalareasoldiers.Inthefirst
developmentof
militaryslavery,the
followingse-137.
Papoulia,p.13,notesthispossibilitytoo.Anotherdiscussionofal-H.
akam’scorps:Lvi-Provengal,
p.130.138.Mostoftheslaverecruitswere
Saqliba;Ayaionhasannouncedadetailedstudyonthisterm
("Aspects,"p.224),so referthereadertohisresearchforanexplanationofthiselusiveethnicidentification(itismore
ambiguousintheSpanishcontextthanelsewhere).SlavesalsocamefromNorth
Africa,bothBer-hersandBlacks(S.M.Imamuddin,Some
Aspects
oftheSocio-EconomicandCulturalHistory
ofMuslim
Spain[Leiden,1965],
p.61).