AnExplanation
ofMilitary
Slavery
69umma
hadbecomea
pipedream,itremainedavital
emotionalanchor.
Regardlessofthedivisions
into
kingdomsandthe
war-fare
amongthem,
the
communityofIslamdid
notloseitsallureforMuslim
peoples;theysawdevotiontothe
ummaasan
expres-sion
of
allegiancetoIslam
andits
principles.Concern
forthetotalityof
Muslims,oftena
fuzzynotion,tookthe
placeoflocalpatriotism.Muslim
subjectsfeltmoreofa
bondtotheummathanto their
governments; the
transitory, arbitrary, local ruleofsomekingpaledintheface
ofthe
permanent,grand,universalumma.2Asthe
unityoftheumma,rule
bythecaliph,andwarfareagainst
onlyunbelievers
turnedinto
piousfictions,Islamicidealsbecame
evermoreisolatedfrom
life.The
governmentofAllahandthe
governmentofthesultan
grewapart.Socialand
politicallifewaslivedon
two
planes,ononeofwhich
happeningswouldbe
spirituallyvalidbut
actuallyunreal,whileon
theotherno
validitycould
everbe
aspiredto.28But, unreal
as
theywere, Islamic
public ideals
continued todominate Muslimthinking. Any number of
examplesshow
this;
militaryslaveryitselfmakesthe
pointwell.Thescholarsar-guedfine
pointsofShariCabut
didnot
recognize--oratleastacknowledge--this
preeminentinstitution.Withthe
singleex-ceptionofNi.zm
al
Mulk’sbrief
description
(Appendix2),nowriteron
politics
deignedto discussmilitary slavery!And
itnever
appearsin
theShariCa.
Havingno
placein
theory,slavesoldiershad
no
placeintheMuslim
consciousness, which
re-mainedattuned to
Islamic ideals and
pulled
awayfromdis-
cordantrealities.Buttheworld
wasfilledwithharsh
facts;howdid
theMuslimsdealwiththem?TheWithdrawalfrom
Power
Muslim
subjects responded to troublesome realities
by with-drawingfrom
politicsandwarfare.They
avoidedthe
blatantnonimplementationofIslamic
goalsinthe
publicspherebyre-27.
Goitein,p.40;
Lapidus,p.30;
Hodgson,2:53,57.28.
Grunebaum,Medieval
Islam,p.143;also
p.153.