REFERENCESREFERENCES 245 245
was too business-like and authoritative, did not fit into the
need for autonomy of men, and lacked pleasure, character,
sensuality and emotionality. However, the notion of person-
alisation, and the description of ingredients and scientific
research, were noted as strong points. In terms of advertising
effects, the conclusions were that they were identifiable,
attractive, aesthetic, masculine, informative and simple.
However, the non-German name of the product, the ‘coach’
idea and the non-selective packaging were negative points,
leading to low spontaneous recognition. The conclusion was
that the brand statement needed to be redefined, using
elements such as: skin care specialist, scientific knowledge,
innovation, highlighting skin care benefits and sensations.
The communications elements to stress were the specific
characteristics of the product, the sensuality of the product
and the models, and the key colour codes on each product.
It was further concluded that, in order to build brand loyalty,
the identification of men with the product needed to be
enhanced by means of clear claims, visible skin results,
identification of skin types, needs and benefits, and identi-
fication of products offer.
QUESTIONS
- Is the vision and branding strategy of Biotherm and
Biotherm Homme mainly global (standardised) or local
(adapted to local cultures)? Explain and give examples.
2. Looking at the different types of needs that people
can experience (for instance, consider Maslow’s hierarchy
with physiological as the most basic followed by safety,
love/belonging, esteem and finally self-actualisation – see
http://www.businessballs.com/maslow.htm ). To which
needs do L’Oréal in general, and Biotherm and Biotherm
Homme in particular, appeal? Do you believe these
needs are universal?
3. Clinique is mentioned as one of the closest competitors
of Biotherm. Why? In what ways is the positioning of
Biotherm and Clinique similar or different (use com-
munications materials, websites, etc., to illustrate)?
4. Summarise the main similarities and differences of the
results of the focus group discussions in the three
countries studied. Can you find a relationship between
the cultural characteristics of the countries and the
attitudes and perceptions of the group members from
these countries?
5. Is Biotherm Homme positioned differently in different
countries (consult communications materials, websites,
etc.)? Why or why not?
6. Are the conclusions and the marketing communications
implications of the German Biotherm Homme study
correct? Would you adapt the communications strategy
in a different way?
Sources : Materials provided by Teresa di Campello and Joëlle Van Rijckevorsel, L’Oréal. http://www.loreal.com ; http://www.biotherm.com ; http://www.loreal.com/_en/_ww/
pdf/Rapport_Annuel_2008_FR.pdf ; http://www.loreal.com (accessed 9 July 2012).
References
1 Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2010), Principles of Marketing ,
13th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2 http://www.statista.com (accessed 9 July 2012).
3 Many organisations off er soft ware to help companies
to plan their advertising campaigns. See, for instance,
http://www.paloalto.com.
4 Solomon, B. and Askegaard, H. (2007), Consumer Behaviour:
A European Perspective , 3rd edition. Harlow: Pearson
Education.
5 Geuens, M., De Pelsmacker, P. and Mast, G. (2003),
‘Family Structure as a Moderator of Parent–Child Com-
munication about Consumption’, International Journal of
Advertising and Marketing to Children , 4(1), 1–6; Roedder
John, D. (1999), ‘Consumer Socialization of Children:
A Retrospective Look at Twenty-fi ve Years of Research’,
Journal of Consumer Research , 26(3), 183–213; McNeal,
J.U. (1999), Kids Market: Myths and Realities , Ithaca, NY:
Paramount Market; Gunter, B. and Furnham, A. (1998),
Children as Consumers: A Psychological Analysis of the
Young People’s Market , London: Routledge; Acuff , D.S.
(1997), What Kids Buy and Why: Th e Psychology of
Marketing to Kids. New York: Free Press.
6 Clegg, A. (2006), Mining the Golden Years , 24 April,
http://www.brandchannel.com/features_effect.asp?pf_
id=311 (accessed June 2009).
7 Weijters, B. and Geuens, M. (2003), ‘Evaluation of Age-
Related Labels by Senior Citizens’, Working paper, Vlerick
Leuven Gent Management School; Young, G. (2002),
‘Ageing and the UK Economy’, Bank of England Quarterly
Bulletin , 42(3), 285–92.
8 Walker, M.M. and Macklin, M.C. (1992), ‘Th e Use of Role
Modeling in Targeting Advertising to Grandparents’,
Journal of Advertising Research , 32(4), 37–45.
9 Ahmad, R. (2002), ‘Th e Older Ageing Consumers in the UK:
Are Th ey Really that Diff erent?’, International Journal of
Market Research , 44(3), 337–60; Moschis, G.P. and Mathur, A.
(1997), ‘Targeting the Mature Market: Opportunities and
Challenges’, Journal of Consumer Marketing , 14(4), 282–93.
M07_PELS3221_05_SE_C07.indd 245M07_PELS3221_05_SE_C07.indd 245 6/5/13 3:01 PM6/5/13 3:01 PM