The Washington Post - 07.03.2020

(Steven Felgate) #1

SATURDAy, MARCH 7 , 2020. THE WASHINGTON POST EZ RE A


ALABAMA

Accomplice in killing
of officers is e xecuted

A man convicted as an
accomplice in another man’s
killing of three Alabama police
officers in 2004 was executed
Thursday evening.
Inmate Nathaniel Woods, 43,
was pronounced dead at
9:01 p.m. Central time Thursday
following a lethal injection at the
state prison in Atmore,
authorities said.
Alabama’s first execution of
the year came after a last-minute
bid to stop it, which included
support from the son of civil
rights leader the Rev. Martin
Luther King Jr. and others who
argued it was unfair to execute a
man who didn’t pull the trigger
in the slaying.
The state of Alabama said
Woods was an active participant
with the slayings and had
bragged about it afterward in
statements, song lyrics and art.
The U.S. Supreme Court
issued a temporary stay to
consider last-minute appeals but
ultimately denied the inmate’s
petitions. Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey
(R) denied a request for
clemency.
Woods and Kerry Spencer
were convicted of capital murder
and sentenced to death in the
slayings of the three
Birmingham officers. The

officers’ deaths in a hail of
gunfire rocked Alabama’s largest
city in 2004. Carlos Owen,
Harley A. Chisolm III and
Charles R. Bennett died while
trying to serve a misdemeanor
domestic assault warrant on
Woods at a suspected drug
house.
Prosecutors said Spencer, who
was convicted before Woods and
is on death row, was the
triggerman in the slaying.
— Associated Press

TEXAS

Woman who beheaded
daughter is convicted

A Te xas woman accused of
stabbing and beheading her
5-year-old daughter in 2017 has
been convicted of capital murder
and sentenced to life in prison.
A Hays County jury on
Thursday convicted Krystle
Villanueva, 27, in the death of

her daughter, Giovanna
Hernandez. The girl was killed at
their home in Kyle, located
about 20 miles southwest of
Austin.
Jurors also found Villanueva
guilty of aggravated assault with
a deadly weapon in the stabbing
of the girl’s grandfather, who
survived.
A judge sentenced Villanueva
to life in prison without parole.
Villanueva was arrested after
police were called to the home
she shared with Giovanna, the
girl’s father and his parents.
Prosecutors said Villaneuva
told a 911 operator that she
killed her daughter because “she
asked for cereal” and then
stabbed her father-in-law.
Her defense attorney, Carlos
Garcia, said Villaneuva suffered
from psychosis for many years.
He said that on the day of the
attack, she believed her family
had been taken over by clones.
— Associated Press

DIGEST

Politics & the Nation


BY SHAWN MULCAHY

chicago — In t he harshly lit gym
of the Cook County jail, a complex
of concrete and barbed wire on
the city’s West S ide, five visitors sit
at a plastic folding table. Five
chairs face them.
An officer tells inmates to line
up along a wall, then directs them
one by one to sit down. That’s
when the visitors — volunteers
from the civic advocacy group
Chicago Votes — start talking
about the upcoming Illinois pri-
mary and helping the men who
are interested to register for cast-
ing a ballot.
For the first time, the jail will b e
its own polling precinct in this
month’s primary election.
More than four decades after
the Supreme Court upheld the
right to vote for people in pretrial
detention, many Americans re-
main blocked from exercising
that right because states don’t
have procedures in place to allow
access. Illinois is no longer one of
them, with a new law requiring all
jails to ensure that some 20,
pretrial detainees have an oppor-
tunity to vote.
Most counties are complying
by distributing absentee ballots
upon request until the voter-reg-
istration deadline, but the law
directs any jurisdiction of more
than 3 million residents — which
is only Cook County — to set up
actual voting machines within a
facility’s confines.
In Chicago, Sheriff To m Dart is
an enthusiastic supporter. The jail
he oversees is the nation’s second
largest. About 95 percent of its
5,700 inmates are awaiting trial,
some of them for as long as a few
years.
“I don’t k now if there’s a heck of
a lot more [than voting] that con-
nects you to your community,”
Dart said. “You’re connected be-
cause you’re engaged in the issues
that matter in your community.
You’re making your voice heard.”
The jail will have more than a
half-dozen temporary polling lo-
cations supervised by the Cook
County Clerk’s O ffice and Chicago
Board of Elections, which expect
much interest given the presiden-
tial campaign and contentious
races for state’s attorney and a
congressional seat. Voting will
ta ke place in the jail’s gyms, cha-
pels, law library and other special
spaces during the two weekends
leading up to the March 17 elec-
tion.
“Even though I’m not out t here,
I want better,” said 53-year-old
Archie Collins, who is facing a
drug charge. “So, whatever it
ta kes to make this a better world, I
got my hands in.”
It’s quite a turnaround for the
jail, which was mired in contro-
versy when Dart took office in



  1. Two years later, a federal


Justice Department report identi-
fied systematic violations of in-
mates’ constitutional rights, in-
cluding physical abuse by officers,
inadequate medical care a nd dan-
gerous building conditions.
Dart has since led significant
operational changes and added
features such as wood-fired pizza
ovens, a beekeeping program and
even a hydroponics system con-
nected to the jail’s community
garden.
“We’re at this unique point
where so many of the things that
are broken in our society are com-
ing in,” he said in an interview.
“We can put s trategies together to
try to address it that help human
beings and save society tons of
money.”
For the primary, the sheriff
worked with Chicago’s public t ele-
vision station to air two-minute
videos inside the jail on local can-
didates’ backgrounds and posi-
tions. He a lso invited educators to
teach civics classes. This election
cycle alone, Chicago Votes made

11 visits and registered nearly
1,500 inmates to vote.
“By the time we get done with
this, the folks voting here are
going to be more educated about
the election and the candidates
than the average voter,” Dart said.
More than 462,000 people who
have not been convicted of a crime
are locked up in local jails across
the country, according to the Pris-
on Policy Initiative. Advocates say
preventing them from voting is a
serious civil rights violation.
“We have no sound policy rea-
son for excluding people in the
criminal justice system from our
voting and election systems,” said
Ami Gandhi, senior counsel for
the Chicago Lawyers’ Committee
for Civil Rights. “The exclusion
has happened purely so that peo-
ple currently in power could hang
onto their power and manipulate
who is eligible to vote for their
own political advantage.”
A county commissioner in Har-
ris County, Tex., which includes
Houston and one of the nation’s

largest jails, proposed designat-
ing that facility as a polling pre-
cinct. But the plan, which lacked
the force of law, stalled last year
because of security, Internet con-
nectivity and other logistical con-
cerns.
Gandhi and a coalition of activ-
ists first took the issue to the
Illinois General Assembly in 2018
with the backing of Juliana Strat-
ton, a legislator representing part
of Chicago at the time.
“I think this is an opportunity
to make sure that people are re-
stored to the community a nd have
the full rights that are available to
them,” said Stratton (D), who is
now lieutenant governor. “Voting
is one of those rights.”
The “Voting in Jails” b ill cleared
both chambers but was vetoed by
then-Gov. Bruce Rauner (R). He
told lawmakers that while he sup-
ported “expansion of access,” re-
quiring jail officials to take part in
voter registration and education
efforts exceeded “the legitimate
role of law enforcement.”

Undeterred, supporters rein-
troduced the bill in 2019 after G ov.
J.B. Pritzker (D) took office. It
passed overwhelmingly, and
Pritzker signed it into law in Au-
gust.
State Sen. Omar Aquino (D),
the measure’s sponsor, said that
while other states put up new
barriers to voting, “it’s quite pro-
gressive of the state of Illinois to
do the opposite.”
Illinois is among 17 states that
prohibit only those serving a sen-
tence from voting. Upon a prison-
er’s r elease, voting r ights are auto-
matically restored.
Ye t even explicit voting protec-
tions often fall short in practice,
noted Danielle Lang of the Cam-
paign Legal Center, a D.C.-based
national nonprofit that supports
greater access to voting. “Unlike
some other voting barriers that
you might consider to be tradi-
tional red state-blue state issues,
issues around access to voting in
jail are endemic in most states.”
Legislatures nationwide have

long imposed policies that can
suppress minority participation,
often intentionally. More than a
dozen states have restrictive voter
ID laws, including several with
tough p hoto ID rules, according to
the Brennan Center for Justice.
Some election officials have ag-
gressively purged voter rolls, es-
pecially in states with a history of
discrimination, a 2018 Brennan
Center report detailed.
Florida voters went the other
way that year, approving a consti-
tutional amendment that auto-
matically restored voting r ights to
nearly 1.4 million residents who
had finished serving felony con-
victions. But Republican lawmak-
ers subsequently passed a mea-
sure requiring that ex-felons re-
pay all court-mandated fees be-
fore registering to vote — a move
that some activists labeled a mod-
ern-day poll tax.
The state’s Supreme Court up-
held the law in January, blocking
many people from taking part in
the presidential primary there on
March 17. A federal appeals court
has declared the law unconstitu-
tional, but for now its ruling ap-
plies only to the 17 plaintiffs who
brought the suit.
And on Tuesday, a federal ap-
peals court ruled that Ohio elec-
tion officials d on’t h ave to provide
absentee ballots to individuals
jailed after the deadline for re-
questing such a ballot. By compar-
ison, people hospitalized because
of an accident or medical emer-
gency can still ask for an absentee
ballot through part of Election
Day.
Illinois may become a model —
or inspiration — with its new law.
“I think everybody’s looking at
that law now as the standard,”
said Chiraag Bains, legal strate-
gies director at the liberal think
tank Demos.
Among those closely watching
its implementation is Elly Kalfus,
an organizer with the Emancipa-
tion Initiative in Massachusetts.
Kalfus led a vote-by-mail cam-
paign in jails there in 2018 and
lobbied state lawmakers for a bill
similar to the one that passed in
Illinois. T hat bill is still pending.
People who experience the
criminal justice system as defen-
dants have typically been exclud-
ed from policy discussions, she
noted. “Once people in jail are
actually allowed to vote, that
could potentially change things.”
Cook County and Chicago elec-
tion officials don’t anticipate any
technical problems when inmates
head to the jail’s polls. The sheriff
says their voting will be a major
step forward. But there’s much
more to do, in his view.
“The only thing that keeps me
here,” Dart said, “is if we take
these ideas of ours and spread
them to the rest of the country.”
[email protected]

For first time, Chicago jail


becomes a polling precinct


JOSHUA LOTT FOR THE WASHINGTON POST
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart oversees the second-largest jail in the country, with 5,700 inmates, about 95 percent of whom are
awaiting trial. An Illinois law passed last year requires all jails to ensure that pretrial detainees have an opportunity to vote.

BY SPENCER S. HSU
AND ANN E. MARIMOW

House Democrats asked a fed-
eral appeals court in Washington
on Friday to reconsider enforcing
a congressional subpoena for
President Trump’s former White
House counsel D onald McGahn.
The request comes after a divid-
ed panel of the U.S. Court of Ap-
peals for the D.C. Circuit found
that the c ourts have no authority to
resolve the separation-of-powers
dispute between the White House
and Democrats in Congress.
Lawyers for House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) want a full
complement of judges on the ap-
peals court to overturn the ruling
from a three-judge panel of the
same court. If last week’s ruling
stands, it means McGahn can d efy
the subpoena from the House Ju-
diciary C ommittee.
Even if the full D.C. Circuit
agrees to take a second look, the
case is likely to be appealed to the
Supreme C ourt.
“The stakes of the Committee’s
inquiry are exceedingly high,” the
House argued in a 17-page appeal.
“The Committee is investigating
allegations of President Trump’s
improper political influence into
ongoing criminal matters. Mc-
Gahn was a key eyewitness to
these events whom President
Trump tried to enlist in this
wrongdoing. P resident Trump has
countered that McGahn is lying.
The Committee must hear from
McGahn directly.”
Attorneys for the House said
the 2-to-1 ruling conflicts with a
1976 precedent in which the cir-
cuit court upheld the House’s
standing to intervene in a lawsuit
the Justice Department filed to


block AT&T from complying with
a subcommittee subpoena.
Blocking the McGahn subpoe-
na, the House argued, is “sorely
misguided” because it under-
mines Congress’s constitutional
authority to check a president’s
powers and encourages presiden-
tial stonewalling by future execu-
tives who can rest secure knowing
that “direct, widescale noncompli-
ance” i s irremediable.
House Democrats went to court
after Trump blocked McGahn’s
testimony, saying the key presi-
dential adviser c ould not b e forced
to answer questions or turn over
documents.
Judge Thomas B. Griffith, writ-
ing for the majority, agreed with
the Justice Department argument
that courts should stay o ut of such
political d isputes.
In d issent, J udge Judith W. R og-
ers said the high court has long
recognized Congress’s power to
investigate and subpoena infor-
mation and warned the ruling un-
dermines l egislative oversight.
Ordering McGahn to appear be-
fore the committee, she wrote,
does not require the court to
choose sides because the subpoe-
na is not a demand for McGahn to
answer specific questions — only
to appear in person.
The third judge on the panel,
Karen LeCraft Henderson, agreed
with Griffith’s overall judgment
but rejected a Trump administra-
tion claim that top White House
aides enjoy “absolute immunity”
from compelled testimony.
The House committee subpoe-
naed McGahn in August before
the start of formal impeachment
proceedings. Lawmakers said Mc-
Gahn was the “most important”
witness on the question of wheth-
er Trump obstructed justice in
special counsel Robert S. Mueller
III’s Russia investigation.
Before Trump was acquitted in
the S enate on Feb. 5, House l awyers
said McGahn’s testimony was still
critical to establish a pattern of al-
leged m isconduct b y the p resident.

In Friday’s filing, attorneys for
the House argued the panel erro-
neously relied on a 1997 case in
which the Supreme Court later
said six members of Congress
could not go to court to challenge
the constitutionality of a statute.
The case did not say a whole com-
mittee backed by the full House
could not sue, the f iling argued.
They a rgued the panel’s s ugges-
tion that the s tandoff was strictly a
“political dispute” b est resolved by
regular checks and balances be-
tween the legislative and execu-
tive branches “downplayed the
significance of its ruling.”
The accommodations process —
by which both s ides typically nego-
tiate compliance with legislative
oversight demands — “operates
against the backstop of potential
judicial enforcement,” the House
warned. Remove that backstop,
and Congress’s investigative pow-
er “is essentially m eaningless.”
The tools the panel suggested
Congress employ — such as im-
peachment, withholding funds
and shutting down the govern-
ment, or having the House ser-
geant at arms make arrests to en-
force a subpoena — “only invite
further constitutional brinkman-
ship and are poor substitutes for
judicial subpoena enforcement,”
the House said.
The court is expected to ask the
Justice Department to respond.
[email protected]
[email protected]

Overturn of McGahn r uling s ought


House Democrats ask
for full-court review
of decision on subpoena

Red Line’s
Twinbrook Station
(301) 770-

FREE Appraisal Day Saturday, March 28
th
, 10am – 1pm
Only at 12160 Parklawn Dr, Rockville, Md
Books, Autographs & Manuscripts (Limit 5 items per person)
By Allan Stypeck, Senior Member, American Society of Appraisers

50 % OFF ALL BOOKS
Only at 12160 Parklawn Dr, Rockville, Md

Open Sun-Wed 10-
Thurs-Sat 10-
secondstorybooks.com


  • Upholstery • Shutters • Slipcovers

  • Curtains • Cornices • Swags

  • Roman Shades • Custom Bedding


FREE SHOP AT HOME 1.800.666.
Fairfax 703.425.4887 • Rockville 301.881.
Annapolis 410.224.2360 • DC 202.537.
http://www.millendshops.net • Mill End Shops • @millend_shops

CUSTOM


Call for details

50 % Off!


Up
To

Spring Sale!

Custom tailored furniture and window treatments

New
Rockville
location
Free download pdf