Custom PC - UK (2020-08)

(Antfer) #1

T


helowerdown Intel’s 9th-gen product stack you
go,themore the lack of Hyper-Threading seemed
tohurtitschances against AMD. The likes of the
Corei5-9600Kwereadequate for gaming, but they were
hopelesslyoutgunned in multi-threaded tasks, even by
cheaperAMDCPUs.
Likewise,theCorei5-8600K too also had six cores and six
threadslikeits9th-gen successor, but arrived too late to steal
AMD’sthunder.WhatIntel needed, above all else, was to boost
multi-threadedperformance, either by increasing core counts
oraddingHyper-Threading. Thankfully, that’s now been done,
withevery10th-genmodel supporting Hyper-Threading,
includingtheCorei5-10600K.
Thismeansit canexecute 12 concurrent threads, instead of
justsixlikeitspredecessor, and this essentially makes it very
similartothevenerable Core i7-8700K.
BothCPUshavethe same number of cores and threads
andunder the hood, and they both have 12MB of L3 cache.

Sadly, you won’t be able to upgrade to the new chip unless
you buy a new motherboard, though, as the Core i5-10600K
uses the new LGA1200 socket and requires a Z490 or other
400-series Intel chipset motherboard.
The Core i5-10600K sports the same physical tweaks
as the flagship Core i9-10900K, with a thinner die and
thicker heatspreader. This should, according to Intel, allow
heat to migrate out of the die faster and make use of the
more thermally conductive and thicker heatspreader,
potentially lowering temperatures and improving
overclocking headroom. It has the same 125W TDP as the
Core i9-10900K, but this is likely to be higher in reality,
although the Core i5-9600K and Core i7-8700K were
never particularly hot or power-hungry CPUs.
Frequencies are a fair bit lower than its more expensive
sibling, peaking at just 4.8GHz. This is because the Core
i5-10600K lacks both Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology
3 and Thermal Velocity Boost. While the boost on the Core
i9-10900K proved to be a tad unreliable in our testing, it still
potentially represents a 500MHz advantage over the Core i5.
The all-core boost frequencies sat at 4.5GHz for the Core i
and 4.9GHz for the Core i9-10900K – again, that’s a sizeable
advantage for the Core i9, but the Core i5 still has an extra
200MHz of boost frequency over the Core i7-8700K and Core
i5-9600K, which both peaked at 4.3GHz with all six cores
under load.
Costing just under £270 inc VAT, the Core i5-10600K only
costs around £15 more than the Core i5-9600K at launch,
and back in 2017, the Core i7-8700K debuted at around £
more. The trouble for Intel is that AMD’s recent price cuts have
seen the Ryzen 7 3700X’s price dip to £280 ,while the Ryzen
5 3600X can be bought for around £200. The fact that AMD
is set to launch Zen 3 CPUs later this year is beside the point
for now, as Intel needs to grapple with Ryzen CPUs that are
already available first, as well as persuading people to make
the necessary move to an LGA1200 motherboard.

Performance
We hit the same frequency of 5.1GHz across all of
the Core i5-10600K’s cores as we did with the Core
i9-10900K, again with 5.2GHz being stable in most

REVIEWS / PROCESSORS


THREAD




  • Awesome gaming
    performance for
    the money




  • Overclockable




  • Decent multi-
    threaded
    performance




THREADWORM



  • AM D better value
    for multi-threading

  • Requires new
    motherboard

  • Average stock
    speed
    performance


cc


uu
sstommPP
CC

P
R
E
M
IUM GR

A


D


E


INTELCORE i510600K / £269 inc VAT


LGA1200 CPU


SUPPLIER novatech.co.uk

Free download pdf