Article reSeArcH
MF01 MF02 MF03 MF04HSPC WT
HSPC MUTMkP WT
MkP MUTHSPCMkPMEPLog(Cell cycle module) 23456P = 0.663456P = 0.0472345P = 0.392345P = 0.23WT
(n=27)
MUT
(n=23)
WT
(n=102)
MUT
(n=554)
WT
(n=51)
MUT
(n=332)
WT
(n=173)
MUT
(n=339)34567P = 3.2 x 10-82468P =1.5 x 10-802468P = 0.150246P = 0.019WT
(n=11)
MUT
(n=16)
WT
(n=56)
MUT
(n=418)
WT
(n=79)
MUT
(n=737)
WT
(n=184)
MUT
(n=569)45678P = 1.5 x 10-9345678P = 2.2 x 10-6345678P = 6.8 x 10-623456P = 0.32WT
(n=30)MUT
(n=40)WT
(n=40)MUT
(n=375)WT
(n=43)MUT
(n=424)WT
(n=118)MUT
(n=503)Log(Cell cycle module) 2Log(Cell cycle module) 2MEP WT
MEP MUT456745674567345P = 0.14 P = 2.7 x 10-4 P = 4.2 x 10-7 P = 5.9 x 10-15WT
(n=29)MUT
(n=36)WT
(n=44)MUT
(n=273)WT
(n=128)MUT
(n=892)WT
(n=180)MUT
(n=533)EPLog(Cell cycle module) 2EP WT
EP MUTeHSP90AA1LIMS1HMGN2H2AFZCCND3TYMSSMC2TMSB4XCKS1BRAN05101520-2 02
Log 2 (Fold Change)-Log(adjusted 10Pvalue)CD74
CYTL1PRSS57CRHBPCPPED1ACTBPDLIM1
SLC44A1HBDHigher in WT MkPs
with High Cell CycleHigher in WT MkPs
with Low Cell Cycle
Cell cycle-related genes
Unfolded protein binding genesd00.10.20.30.4MUTWTPseudotimeP = 0.08cPatient ID
MF01
MF02
MF03
MF04t-SNE2
t-SNE1t-SNE2
t-SNE1PseudotimeEarlyLatet-SNE2
t-SNE1a b051015MUT TGFb module / WT TGFb moduleMF-2/3
MF-3/3Fibrosis Score (MF)
P = 4.7 x 10-4P = 0.0058P = 0.0091P = 0.062MF02MF04MF01MF03# cells = 11,093Extended Data Fig. 8 | CALR-mutated haematopoietic progenitor cells
from myelofibrosis show upregulation of the IRE1-mediated UPR.
a, t-SNE projection of CD34+ progenitor cells from samples MF01–MF04,
after integration and batch correction using the Seurat package (Methods)
(n = 11,093). b, Left, t-SNE projection of CD34+ progenitor cells from
samples MF01–MF04 labelled with pseuodotime^21 (n = 11,093). Right,
pseudotime comparison between wild-type (n = 2,221) and mutant
(n = 7,483) cells. P values from likelihood ratio tests of linear mixed model
with genotype as fixed effect and individual patient samples as random
effect, against the model without the genotype effect (Methods). c, Cell-
cycle module score comparison between wild-type and mutant cells in
patients with myelofibrosis (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test). d, Ratio
of TGFβ-signalling-pathway gene expression of mutant and wild-type
MkPs. One mutant and one wild-type MkP were randomly sampled for
each round of analysis (n = 100 iterations; two-sided Wilcoxon-rank sum
test). e, Differentially expressed genes between wild-type MkPs with high
cell-cycle expression (n = 220) and wild-type MkPs with low cell-cycle
expression (n = 110), common across samples MF02–MF04. P values
were combined using Fisher’s combined test with Benjamini–Hochberg
adjustments. Weighted average of fold change (expressed in log 2 ) based on
cell number across samples is shown (Methods).