Science - USA (2020-06-05)

(Antfer) #1
SCIENCE sciencemag.org

GRAPHIC: JOSHUA BIRD/


SCIENCE


responses could also form against patho-
gens, as proposed for NK cells in response
to viral infections ( 2 ).
Macrophages are heterogeneous tissue-
resident cells: Yolk sac– and fetal liver
monocyte–derived tissue-resident macro-
phages colonize different tissues during
embryonic development ( 11 ). These are
long-lived and able to self-renew, so the
specific characteristics of these macro-
phages rely on their niche ( 11 ). For example,
lung macrophages are exposed to airway
antigens, whereas Kupffer cells in the liver
are exposed to gut-derived molecules ( 12 ).
The phenotype of a microglial cell in the
brain greatly differs from that of a perito-
neal macrophage ( 11 ). The potential ability
of these and other myeloid cell subsets to
develop different types of immunological
memory to antigens could offer additional
evidence for their different functions across
tissues and help to explain the development

of different types of memory responses to
the same antigens in different locations. In
this context, it will be crucial to address if
the antigen-specific responses by myeloid
cells can also be inhibitory and may be in-
volved in the development of immunologi-
cal tolerance leading to the lack of respon-
siveness against harmless molecules such as
antigens expressed by commensal bacteria,
or self-antigens. Immunological tolerance
prevents harmful immune responses in the
host, whereas failure of these mechanisms
results in tissue damage and autoimmune
responses ( 13 ). Indeed, polymorphisms
in genes of the human leukocyte antigen
(HLA) system, the human version of MHC,
are associated with celiac disease, inflam-
matory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthri-
tis, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes, and multiple
sclerosis ( 14 , 15 ). Additional studies have
found genetic associations between MHC-I
and infectious diseases such as HIV, human
hepatitis B virus, and tuberculosis ( 14 ).
If monocytes and macrophages develop

antigen-specific memory to antigens pre-
sented by donor-derived MHC-I molecules,
it is likely that these and other myeloid cells
can develop immunological memory to
self- and nonself antigens of different
sources. Given the variety of receptors ex-
pressed by the different types of myeloid
cells, the implications of these mechanisms
could encompass many processes beyond
organ transplantation, including the re-
sponse to pathogens, vaccines, inflamma-
tory and autoimmune diseases, or the de-
velopment of allergies. Dai et al. identified
several families of polymorphic Ig super-
family receptors that could bind to MHC-I
molecules. The extension of this search to
other receptors that can bind antigens of a
different nature could lead to the identifica-
tion of other structures with the potential
to trigger or block antigen-specific memory
in myeloid cells, potentially offering a new
set of targets for immunotherapy.

REFERENCES AND NOTES


  1. F. A. Bonilla, H. C. Oettgen, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125
    (suppl. 2), S33 (2010).

  2. M. G. Netea et al., Nat. Rev. Immunol. 1 0. 1 0 3 8 /s 4 1 5 7 7-
    020-0285-6 (2020).

  3. L. C. J. de Bree et al., Semin. Immunol. 39 , 35 (2018).

  4. H. Dai et al., Science 368 , 1122 (2020).

  5. F. L. Watson et al., Science 309 , 1874 (2005).

  6. S. M. Zhang, C. M. Adema, T. B. Kepler, E. S. Loker, Science
    305 , 251 (2004).

  7. L. Du Pasquier, Science 309 , 1826 (2005).

  8. M. G. Netea, A. Schlitzer, K. Placek, L. A. B. Joosten, J. L.
    Schultze, Cell Host Microbe 25 , 13 (2019).

  9. S.-C. Cheng et al., Science 345 , 1250684 (2014).

  10. E. Kaufmann et al., Cell 172 , 176 (2018).

  11. M. Guilliams, G. R. Thierry, J. Bonnardel, M. Bajenoff,
    Immunity 52 , 434 (2020).

  12. A. J. Macpherson, M. Heikenwalder, S. C. Ganal-
    Vonarburg, Cell Host Microbe 20 , 561 (2016).

  13. J. A. Bluestone, Immunol. Rev. 241 , 5 (2011).

  14. V. Matzaraki, V. Kumar, C. Wijmenga, A. Zhernakova,
    Genome Biol. 18 , 76 (2017).

  15. J. Domínguez-Andrés, M. G. Netea, Trends Immunol. 40 ,
    1105 (2019).


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
M.G.N. is supported by a European Research Council
Advanced Grant (no. 833247) and a Spinoza Grant.

10.1126/science.abc2660

Resting Activation Development of memory Memory response

Monocytes
Macrophages

Epigenetic
changes

Trained immunity

Specifc innate
immune memory
PIR-A MHC-I specifcity

Second
stimulus

Cytokines

Cytokines

First
stimulus

DEVELOPMENT

Testicular-borne


factors affect


sperm fertility


Immature testicular germ


cells secrete factors that


influence sperm maturation


in mice


By Te s s a L o r d^1 and Jon M. Oatley^2

M

ale fertility relies on the genesis of
sperm in seminiferous tubules of
the testis and their maturation dur-
ing transit through the epididymis.
Mouse models with impaired devel-
opment of the most proximal region
of the epididymis, the initial segment (IS),
possess sperm that are morphologically nor-
mal but incapable of fertilizing an egg ( 1 ). It
has been postulated that factors synthesized
in the testis are released into the lumen of tu-
bules (lumicrine factors) and influence devel-
opment and function of the IS. However, the
identity of such factors has remained elusive.
On page 1132 of this issue, Kiyozumi et al.
( 2 ) identify and characterize the first known
lumicrine factor, the germ cell–secreted pro-
tein neural epidermal growth factor–like like
2 (NELL2). They demonstrate a key role for
NELL2 in driving development of the IS of
mice, culminating in the production of IS-
secreted proteases that are indispensable for
sperm processing in the epididymis and thus
male fertility.
The epididymis is a convoluted ductal sys-
tem of up to 1 m in length in mice and 6 m
in humans. Testicular sperm must transit the
length of the epididymis to gain the capacity
for fertilization, including activation of the
machinery that drives motility as well as egg
recognition and binding. Given that sperma-
tozoa are transcriptionally and translation-
ally silent, the process of sperm maturation
is largely attributed to activities of epididy-
mal epithelial cells, which can include post-
translational modification, augmentation,
and processing of sperm proteins. Proteomic
comparisons of sperm collected from the
more proximal regions of the epididymis

(^1) Priority Research Centre for Reproductive Science,
Discipline of Biological Sciences, the University of Newcastle,
Callaghan, NSW, Australia.^2 Center for Reproductive
Biology, School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State
University, Pullman, WA, USA. Email: [email protected]
Different forms of innate immunological memory
Some myeloid cells can develop memory. After a first stimulus, retained epigenetic changes can facilitate
the production of cytokines after a nonspecific stimulus (trained immunity). Macrophages can also develop
specific memory through paired immunoglobulin-like receptor-A (PIR-A) specificity to antigens presented by
major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I).
5 JUNE 2020 • VOL 368 ISSUE 6495 1053
Published by AAAS

Free download pdf