TheEconomistAugust 8th 2020 Science & technology 65
I
nsects dominate dryland. About1m
specieshavebeendescribed,morethan
twiceasmanyasallothermulticellularan-
imalspecies,terrestrialandmarine,putto-
gether.Severaltimesthatnumberarereck-
oned to await discovery. The oceans,
though,aremostlyinsect-free.A fewskate
overthesurface,butnonedivewillingly
belowthewaves.
Atleast,thatwastheconsensusuntilre-
cently.ButSoledadLeonardiatconicet-
cenpatinArgentinaandClaudioLazzariat
theUniversityof Tours, inFrance, have
foundanexception:the 13 speciesoflice
thatlatchontoseals.Thatsealshaveliceis
notnews.ButDrLeonardiandDrLazzari
haveshownthat,contrarytopreviousbe-
lief,thesepassengersdonotabandonship,
asit were,andremainondrylandwhenthe
sealsgoswimming.Instead,theyclingon
and brave not only the hostile, saline
chemistryofseawater,butalsothetremen-
douspressuresimposedwhentheirhosts
divetodepthsofseveralhundredmetresin
searchofprey.
DrLeonardiandDrLazzaridisposedof
thesalinityquestionin 2014 bythesimple
procedureofdunkingsealliceinseawater
for prolonged periods, and discovering
thattheydidnotdie.Now,astheyreportin
theJournal of Experimental Biology, they
havedealtwiththequestionofpressure.
Todoso,theycollectedrepresentatives
ofthelousespeciesthatdwellsuponthe
deepest-divingpinnipedofthemall,the
South Atlanticelephant seal, whichcan
diveasfaras2,000metres.Usingtweezers,
theyprised 75 licefromtheflippersof 15
weaned seal pups that were sitting by
themselvesonthebeach.Theythenput
theirtrophiesintoa bronzecompression
chamber, filledwithsalt water, and ex-
posed the insects to pressures ranging
fromamild30kg/cm^2 (muchlikeswim-
ming 300 metres below the surface) to
200kg/cm^2 (the full two kilometres).
That 69 of the lice survived this treat-
ment suggests that, far from abandoning
their hosts when they go for a swim (which
always sounded a slightly desperate ap-
proach, given that it meant surviving on
the beach until another host came along),
the lice almost certainly stay on board for
the ride. Indeed, an accidental extension of
the experiment caused by an equipment
malfunction suggests 200kg/cm^2 is pea-
nuts for an elephant-seal louse. The mal-
function caused one louse to suffer a
whopping 450kg/cm^2 for several minutes
before the system could be shut down. The
bug survived the ordeal intact.
Assuming lice are typical of the wider
class of insects, it seems that neither chem-
istry nor pressure prevent insect colonisa-
tion of the oceans. As parasites, lice of all
sorts lead fairly pampered lives compared
with their free-living insect cousins. Per-
haps that is the difference. Or maybe respi-
ration is the obstacle—for insects, like
seals, are air-breathing creatures, and
would need, as seals do, to come to the sur-
face to breathe until they evolved gills. But
some freshwater insects (dragonfly
nymphs, for example) have gills, so that
does not seem an unimaginable step. Pos-
sibly, the explanation is that all the oceanic
niches which insects might inhabit are al-
ready taken by their close relatives the
crustaceans. But some crustaceans (woo-
dlice and coconut crabs, for example) have
managed the journey in the opposite direc-
tion, in the face of insect competition. So
what is actually keeping free-living insects
out of the sea remains a mystery. 7
Anexceptiontotherulethatthereare
nomarineinsects
Entomology
Parasitesunder
pressure
A
s theyreopenafterlockdown,
manyrestaurantsarefiringuptheir
barbecues.Dinersappreciatefoodgrilled
overglowingcharcoalembers,butthe
neighboursoftendonot.Pollutionlevels
nearrestaurantscanbenotablyhigher
thanaverage,largelybecauseofemis-
sionsfromkitchens.Withtheincreasing
popularityofindoorbarbecuing,it isa
problemthatissettogetworse.
Facedwithcomplaintsfromresidents
aboutfumesandlingeringsmells,the
GermanEnvironmentAgencyasked
MohammadAleysa,anexpertincom-
bustiontechnologyattheFraunhofer
InstituteforBuildingPhysicsinStutt-
gart,toinvestigate.Theresultsofhis
experimentsweresoshockingthey
droveDrAleysaandhisresearchteamto
inventa cleanersystemforindoorchar-
coalgrilling.
Theresearcherstesteda commercial
grill,completewiththesortofmulti-
stagefilteringsystemusedinmany—
thoughbynomeansall—restaurants.
Apartfromtypicalpollutantssuchas
nitrogenoxides,carbonmonoxideand
particulate matter, they also discovered
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. These
cancer-causing chemicals are mainly
produced by the incomplete combustion
of fats and oil-based marinades.
The researchers estimated that if their
half-a-square-metre grill was used for
nine hours a day, it would release be-
tween 400 and 500 kilograms of fine and
ultrafine particulate matter into the air,
along with 1.5 tonnes of hydrocarbons,
every year. With many restaurants using
2.5-square-metre grills 16 hours a day, the
level of pollution from most commercial
operations would be much higher.
The researchers are investigating
which extraction systems best protect
neighbours and restaurant employees.
Taller chimneys are one option. But Dr
Aleysa suspects they would just shift the
pollution elsewhere. The results of these
tests will be published next year.
Meanwhile, Dr Aleysa’s team have
come up with their own solution: a new
kind of grill, which they reckon can cut
pollutants by 90%. Dr Aleysa is reluctant
to go into specifics. But the basic idea is
that before being vented to the outside,
the fumes are sucked back down through
the embers and into a “combustion
zone”, where hydrocarbons and odour
compounds are fully burnt. That lessens
the need for expensive extraction sys-
tems and fiddly filters that must be regu-
larly cleaned.
An industrial partner is keen to put
the grill into production. It could go on
sale by the middle of next year. It will
cost a bit more than a standard grill, says
Dr Aleysa. But he believes that would be
offset by lower maintenance costs. Better
air quality around restaurants would be
welcome. But the big test will be whether
chefs believe the new grill can produce
that same barbecue flavour.
A good grilling
Cookery
Indoorbarbecuesarepopularbut polluting. A fix may be on the way
All of the flavour; none of the fumes