and the molecular basis for affinity enhance-
ment can be rationalized from the RBD-bound
ACE2 cryo–electron microscopy (EM) struc-
ture (Fig. 1E) ( 17 ): Hydrophobic substitutions
of ACE2-T27 increase hydrophobic packing
with aromatic residues of S, ACE2-D30E ex-
tends an acidic side chain to reach S-K417,
and aromatic substitutions of ACE2-K31 con-
tribute to an interfacial cluster of aromatics.
A search for affinity-enhancing mutations in
ACE2 using targeted mutagenesis recently
identified D30E ( 43 ), providing independent
confirmation of this result.
There are also enriched mutations in the
second shell and farther from the interface
that do not directly contact S but instead have
putative structural roles. For example, proline
substitutions were enriched at five library posi-
tions (S19, L91, T92, T324, and Q325) where
they might entropically stabilize the first
turns of helices. Proline was also enriched at
H34 where it may enforce the central bulge
ina1, and multiple mutations were enriched
at buried positions where they will change
local packing (e.g., A25V, L29F, W69V, F72Y,
and L351F). The selection of ACE2 variantsfor high binding signal therefore reports not
only on affinity, but also on presentation at the
membrane of folded structure recognized
by SARS-CoV-2 S. Whether these mutations
selectively stabilize a virus-recognized local
structure in ACE2 versus the global protein
fold is unclear.
Thirty single–amino acid substitutions highly
enriched in the nCoV-S-High sorted cells were
validated by targeted mutagenesis (fig. S3).
Binding of RBD-sfGFP to full-length ACE2
mutants measured by dual-color flow cytom-
etry (fig. S3) increased compared with that ofChanet al.,Science 369 , 1261–1265 (2020) 4 September 2020 2of5
Fig. 1. Sequence preferences
of ACE2 residues for high
binding to the RBD of SARS-
CoV-2 S.(A) Log 2 enrichment
ratios from the nCoV-S-High
sorts are plotted from depleted
or deleterious (orange) to
enriched (dark blue). ACE2
primary structure is shown on
the vertical axis, amino acid
substitutions are indicated on
the horizontal axis. Wild-type
amino acids are in black. Aster-
isk (*) denotes stop codon.
(B) Conservation scores are mapped
to the structure (Protein Data
Bank 6M17) of RBD (green
ribbon)–bound protease domain
(surface), oriented with the
substrate-binding cavity facing
the reader. Residues conserved
for RBD binding are shown in
orange; mutationally tolerant
residues are in pale colors;
residues that are hot spots for
enriched mutations are in blue;
and residues maintained as wild
type in the ACE2 library are in
gray. Glycans are depicted as
dark red sticks. (C) Viewed
looking down on to the RBD
interaction surface. (D) Average
hydrophobicity-weighted enrich-
ment ratios are mapped to the
structure, with residues tolerant
of polar substitutions in blue and
residues that prefer hydrophobics
in yellow. (E) A magnified view
of the ACE2–RBD interface
[colored as in (B) and (C)]. Heat-
map plots log 2 enrichment ratios
from the nCoV-S-High sort. Ab-
breviations for the amino acid
residues are as follows: A, Ala;
C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe;
G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; K, Lys;
L, Leu; M, Met; N, Asn; P, Pro;
Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr;
V, Val; W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.MLIHQNTSAV DEGRK W*FY CP
S 19Q 24E 23E 22I 21T 20F 28L 29
T 27K 26A 25D 38E 37E 35H 34N 33K 31D30A 46L 45Q 42Y 41F 40L 39E 56I 54N 51Y 50N 49W 48N 64N 63M 62N 61Q 60V 59E 57F 72A 71W 69K 68D 67A 65M 82L 79Q 76E 75K 74L 73T 92L 91N 90Q 89P 84Y 83R 273Q 102Q 98Q 96V 93L 95E 329G 326Q 325T 324N 290N 277T 276F 274W 349T 347P 346H 345V 343N 330G 354K 353G 352L 351D 350M 366R 357F 356D 355H 374T 371L 370D 367A 386M 383D 382H 378Amino Acid SubstitutionACE2 residue positionR 393F 390P 389Q 388A 387E 402H 401E 398N 394K 441F 438S 409E 406F 504I 446T 445Q 442S 511Y 510D 509H 505R 518Y 515R 514F 512S-RBDACE2N90-glycanBCT27D30K31WT
WT
WTK31T27ED30K417L455
Y489Y453Q493 H34
E35F456F456F456M
L
I
V
A
S
T
N
Q
D
E
K
R
H
W
Y
F
P
G
C
*Under selectionto change Conserved Tolerates polaramino acids hydrophobicsPrefersAD-3 (depleted)+3 (enriched)Log Enrichment Ratio2RESEARCH | REPORT