Barron’s - USA (2020-09-28)

(Antfer) #1

September 28, 2020 BARRON’S 21


patient’s immune response to the


protein in the vaccine.] Among smaller


vaccine developers that we’re most


confident about, Novavax [NVAX] is


in the lead. Sanofi [SNY] and


GlaxoSmithKline [GSK] are behind


them, but catching up quickly. They


have taken a similar approach, using


Glaxo’s adjuvant and Sanofi’s antigen [a


substance that causes the immune


system to produce antibodies against


it]. I have confidence in both the safety


and efficacy of those products. They’re


probably not going to be available until


the first part of next year.


The viral-vector vaccine programs


[using a weakened virus to transport


pieces of a pathogen into the body to


stimulate an immune response] are


limited by the immunogenicity of the


vector [its ability to provoke a


response]. The messenger RNA


programs [which instruct the body’s


cells to make proteins] seem pretty


reactogenic [side effect–inducing]; 80%


of people getting them get high fevers. I


am somewhat concerned about their


safety and tolerability in large


populations.


Moderna [MRNA] is the most


prominent mRNA company, and


probably the most controversial.


BioNTech [BNTX], CureVac , and


Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings


“Sometime in the next 18 months, a


combination of technology, capital,


expertise, and brilliant people is going to


win the battle.” Geoffrey Porges


treating Covid.


Edward Yoon: While we don’t know


which companies will be the winners


in therapeutics and vaccines, it might


pay to invest in contract manufacturers


who will supply the products. I’m


talking about companies that make


vials and syringes and tests to measure


SvO2 [mixed venous oxygen


saturation] in Covid patients, and


antibodies at scale. It is boring stuff,


but these are the picks and shovels of


the industry. While vaccine manufac-


turers might not make a profit on their


products, companies in the supply


chain could make a bit of money.


For example?


Yoon: I’m referring to companies like


Becton Dickinson [BDX], Danaher


[DHR], and West Pharmaceutical


Services [WST]. On the SvO2 side,


Masimo [MASI] and Medtronic ’s


[MDT] Nellcor unit have a global


duopoly. If testing goes on for a while,


companies such as Hologic [HOLX],


Danaher, and Quidel [QDEL] could


benefit.


Casdin: These are high-margin


businesses with incredibly sticky


products. While there can be volatility


in any given drug program, these


companies have tremendous demand


and are able to diversify across a broad


client base.


Let’s get a quick read: When will we


have a viable Covid vaccine?


Porges: What is “viable”? There will


be EUA [emergency use authorization]


approval of one or more vaccines by the


end of the year, and it will probably be


met with a resounding yawn, other


than by some high-risk people with


pre-existing conditions or occupational


exposure. I’d be surprised if there were


more than a couple of million doses


administered under those


circumstances. The medical


professionals I talk to are profoundly


skeptical about the basis for EUA


approval. If you map out the timeline


for a more general recommendation, or


what I would consider adequate safety


characterization, that doesn’t happen


until the second quarter of next year.


Then there’s the Food and Drug


Administration review, and the ACIP


[Advisory Committee on Immunization


Practices, a committee of the U.S.


Centers for Disease Control and


Prevention] review and recommen-


dations. ACIP’s review will probably


will be even more important than the


FDA’s. Most of us will probably


contemplate getting a vaccine with a


reasonable degree of efficacy that has


been determined safe in the second half


of next year.


Celniker: From a science perspective, I


agree. A lot of these vaccines are


composites. They aren’t a single agent


in a vial, but a mixture of adjuvants


and antigens to which you’re trying to


induce a response. As a result, you


can’t extrapolate the safety profile of


one vaccine to others. Each will have to


go through its own hurdles to


determine safety and efficacy. Then,


what is the value of these vaccines if


the durability of the response isn’t


there? Durability won’t be known for


another year. People have gotten used


to the flu vaccine, which provides


protection for a year. If a Covid vaccine


doesn’t provide durability of at least a


year, there could be a lot of resistance


to getting it.


Yoon: It is unclear how durability will


be defined, too. Will it be defined by the


presence of antibodies, or T-cells? The


science isn’t yet fully understood. I


don’t disagree with Geoff’s timeline,


either, but people have to consider how


high the risk is in their community and


environment. A frontline worker might


want to get a vaccine that could reduce


the severity of the infection. If there is a


big second wave in your community,


you will probably be more willing to


get vaccinated than if the prevalence is


low. We are going to get a ton of vaccine


data in the next eight to 10 weeks,


which will tell us a lot about how


effective the vaccines under


development are. We might have a


different answer 10 weeks from now.


Casdin: The public sees a vaccine as


the gating factor for people to get back


to a normal course of life, but for me,


ease and access to testing and having


data around who is and isn’t infected


seems the best opportunity to return to


normalcy. We are about 35% of the way


to where we need to be when it comes


to testing. If we can get to 75%, even in


the absence of a vaccine, the economy


can get back to some sort of normalcy.


Which vaccine developers are most


likely to produce a successful


product?


Porges: When you talk to vaccine


experts, nearly 100% say they have the


most confidence in traditional adjuvant


protein subunit vaccines, because we


know that technology works. [An


adjuvant is a substance that boosts the


Risks: Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. The funds invest in foreign securities, which involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods.


Each fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and current income.


Each fund’s investment objectives, risk charges and expenses must be considered carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and otherimportant information about the investment company, and it may be obtained


by calling 877-485-8586. Read the prospectus carefully before investing.


Distributed by ALPS Distributors, INC.


For further information, please contact 212.644.1800, [email protected] or visit http://www.cullenfunds.com


CHDVX


CULLEN HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY FUND

Free download pdf