Barron’s - USA (2020-09-28)

(Antfer) #1

M4 BARRON’S September 28, 2020


EUROPEAN TRADER


W


hat’s a little government


meddling, if that is the


price to pay to secure a $27


billion deal? The London


Stock Exchange has sacrificed a few


hundred million dollars because it wants


approval for its acquisition of financial-


data giant Refinitiv.


The British bourse operator has en-


tered into exclusive talks to sell its unit


Borsa Italiana, Italy’s markets operator,


to French rival Euronext (ticker:


ENX.France). The LSE (LSE.UK) has


rejected higher bidders to appease


Rome’s preference for that buyer. The


upside for the British group is that the


sale may unlock the Refinitiv deal.


According to media reports, Euronext


had the lowest offer on the table, com-


pared with those of German group


Deutsche Boerse (DB1.Germany) and


SIX, the Swiss Exchange operator.


The LSE will now have to explain to


its shareholders that the Italian govern-


ment favored Euronext as the next parent


of the country’s stock exchange. Euronext


is ready to make some room, both on the


shareholders’ registry and on the board,


for Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, the Italian


state-owned investor.


It would be easy to blame government


meddling for the apparent loss inflicted


on LSE shareholders. Borsa Italiana


might be sold to the French group for


some 3.5 billion euros ($4.1 billion), which


would be less than rival offers. LSE


bought the unit for €1.6 billion in 2007.


But look beyond the numbers, and


Italy may have done the LSE and its


shareholders a favor. LSE shares rose 1%,


and Euronext’s jumped 4%, the day they


announced they had entered exclusive


negotiations. LSE’s stock is up about 12%


this year, to 8,712 pence ($111.83), while


Euronext’s has gained 37% to €99.


The main reason is that the sale of


Borsa Italiana, which includes the com-


pany’s valuable MTS bond-trading plat-


form, will help LSE win approval from


the European Commission for its acquisi-


tion of Refinitiv from its current owners,


investment-management firm Black-


stone Group (BX) and Thomson Reu-


ters (TRI).


The EU’s competition watchdog said


in June it was launching an investigation


into the deal, on concerns that it might


lead to too much market power in the


trading of government securities if MTS


merged with Tradeweb, Refintiv’s bond-


trading platform. The probe is expected


to be over by mid-December. The sale of


Borsa Italiana would help the LSE’s case.


The LSE was right to look beyond


simple financial arithmetic for another


reason. Exchanges have grown in size


and power in the past 20 years. They are


no longer branches of the state, and are


listed companies on financial markets,


where they prosper.


The LSE’s market capitalization, at


more than 30 billion pounds sterling


($38.2 billion), dwarfs that of Euronext’s


€7 billion. Both are highly valued,


and both have seen their share prices dou-


ble in the past two years. Euronext also


operates exchanges in the Netherlands,


Belgium, Portugal, Ireland, and Norway.


However independent and global they


may be, those large bourse operators live


in close proximity to regulatory authori-


ties and, ultimately, governments. And


governments’ intentions or preferences,


even when they take the form of hard-to-


ignore pressure, are just other market


signals that global players have to recon-


cile with their own strategies.


Even though it may look like it is sell-


ing a valuable asset at a discounted price,


LSE can show its investors that without


it, it might have to give up the Refinitiv


acquisition—which is seen as crucial to


its long-term strategy. Euronext can note


to shareholders that it is paying a reason-


able price, compared with what others


were ready to pay.B


By Pierre Briançon


EMERGING MARKETS


Look Past China for Next


WaveofHotTechStocks


E


merging-market tech stocks,


concentrated in China, have held


up better than their U.S. counter-


parts in the market correction.


The Emerging Markets Internet &


Ecommerce exchange-traded fund


(ticker: EMQQ) has fallen 9% since Sept.


1, compared to 13% for the iShares U.S.


Technology ETF (IYW). Year to date,


the emerging market ETF is up 44%,


against 23% for the U.S. tech basket.


That’s giving emerging market inves-


tors something to brag about after years


of underperformance, but also got them


looking beyond the high-flying Chinese


internet for future returns. “We’ve been


trying to maintain some more balance,


not go all-in on the Chinese tech names,”


says Brian Bandsma, emerging market


equities portfolio manager at Vontobel


Quality Growth.


Twin Chinese giants Alibaba Group


Holding (BABA) and Tencent Holdings


(700.Hong Kong) still look to be on solid


ground, despite year-to-date gains of 26%


and 34%, respectively. They remain cheap


relative to U.S. peers. E-commerce king


Alibaba trades at about 24 times trailing


earnings, compared with more than 80


for Amazon.com (AMZN). “With a mar-


ketplace four times larger than the U.S.,


that’s a pretty compelling case,” says Al-


bert Brenner, director of asset allocation


strategy at People’s United Advisors.


The dominant Chinese players also


have more room to grow, argues Dara


White, global head of emerging markets


equity at Columbia Threadneedle Invest-


ments. Tencent, for instance, hits users of


its Moments social-media platform with


just four ads a day, compared with 25 for


U.S. counterpart Facebook (FB)—giving


it lots of runway to milk more revenue.


But second-tier Chinese tech stocks like


e-commerce rivals JD.com (JD) and Pin-


duoduo (PDD) and food-delivery cham-


pion Meituan Dianping (3690.Hong


Kong) have all doubled this year, entering


nosebleed territory that is pushing inves-


tors into alternatives. Columbia’s White


has his biggest country overweight in


Brazil, where he is focused on a newer


wave of innovators such as e-commerce


platform MercadoLibre (MELI), pay-


ments providers PagSeguro Digital


(PAGS) and StoneCo (STNE), and Mag-


azine Luiza (MGLU3.Brazil), a tradi-


tional retailer rapidly shifting online.


“You’re not buying Brazil, you’re buying


these excellent companies that weren’t


even listed a few years ago,” White says.


Vontobel’s Bandsma favors Indian IT


outsourcers like Tata Consultancy Ser-


vices (TCS.India) and HCL Technolo-


gies (HCLT.India). He’s also dipping into


some beaten-down Old Economy stal-


warts in Latin America, like Mexican


drinks provider Fomento Economico


Mexicano (FMX), Walmart de Mexico


(Walmex.Mexico), and Brazilian brewer


Ambev (ABEV). In June, Barron’s


pointed out that a number of these com-


panies were poised to keep climbing.


Notably absent from the conversation


is anxiety over U.S.-China trade tensions,


which drove Chinese shares last year.


Washington’s fitful moves against partic-


ular companies won’t stop China from


reaping its share of the approaching


booms in 5G telephony and cloud com-


puting, says Mehdi Hosseini, senior eq-


uity analyst at Susquehanna Interna-


tional Group. “You’re definitely seeing a


rebound in Asian 5G investment, and


cloud should come back by spring of next


year,” he says.


Blockades of key technologies like


semiconductors might delay, but not re-


verse, China’s technological ascendancy,


People’s United’s Brenner thinks. “We


can hurt the Chinese economy, but not so


much as to change the prospective land-


scape for investors,” he says.


Whether some of the hot stocks are


worth their current prices is another


question.B


By Craig Mellow


London Stock Exchange


Eyes Big Refinitiv Deal

Free download pdf