University of Sydney: Human Trafficking Criminal wwww.ielts.agency 7
References p. 118
Index p. 127
Appendices
1 Author’s academic qualifications p. 130
2 Prior Research: Research Communique Series p. 131
Exposure
Draft
Document title
Page
1 “Public Version” IELTS assessment rubrics: A call for transparency. 131
2 The hidden curriculum, absent syllabus and severe complexity of the
Academic and General Writing Task 2 component of the IELTS.
145
3 IELTS appeals and remarking: A call for transparency and confirmation of due
process.
164
4 IELTS speaking questions: Non-universal content, hidden curriculum and the
absence of choice.185
5 IELTS Academic reading questions: Pedagogical design flaws. 213
6 Comparing IELTS’s comprehensive mandatory data collection regime to other
major English language test providers.
237
7 A critical review of IELTS’s listening test. 255
8 IELTS’s flawed assessment rubrics: A focus on band 6.5 for speaking and writing. 286
9 IELTS dictates that candidates must use pencil to answer 80 questions. 313
10 An urgent investigation into IELTS’s policy of supplying only one Test Report
Form (TRF) to their fee-paying clients.
31411 Estimating the profits that IELTS earns from its academic appeals process.^316
Acronyms
AASW Australian Association of Social Workers
CELPIP Canadian English Language Proficiency Index Program
IELTS International English Language Testing System UAE United Arab Emirates
UN United Nations
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Contact: [email protected]
Published by The Free School. Copyright is waived if the author is acknowledged.
Digital version available at http://www.ielts.agency and http://www.educate.institute