Imperial    governance  was based   on  standard    principles, drawn   from    the Incas’
evolving     notions     of  sociopolitical  hierarchy,  applied     to  the     societies   brought
under   Cuzco’s authority.  The intent  seems   to  have    been    to  forge   a   nominally
homogeneous polity, presided    over    by  the divine  king    and his relatives.  Despite
their   claims, however,    the Incas   never   achieved    uniform,    ubiquitous  control over
their    subjects.   Instead,    the     imperial    presence    varied  markedly    over    space   and
context.     The     archaeologist   John    Hyslop  suggested   that    imperial    rule    actually
consisted   of  an  array   of  networks—military,  political,  economic,   and ideological
—that   coincided   at  particular  times   and places.
Inca     rule    blended     the     personal    and     the     institutional   in  the    Sapa     Inca,   the
aristocracy  and     imperial    institutions,   such    as  the    temples and service groups.
Because the ruler   personified the state,  the imperial,   the divine, and the royal
were    often   treated as  one and the same.   The administration  was conducted   by
imposed  hierarchies     of  officials,  local   lords,  and     people  drawn   into    special
service,    willingly   or  not.    The practicalities  of  governance  were    complicated by
the great   variety of  subject societies,  which   required    accommodations  to  specific
circumstances.   While   the     structure   and     demands     of  imperial    rule    intruded
heavily  into    the     lives   of  the     Incas’  subjects,   the     contexts    of  interaction     were
limited and much    of  the cycle   of  community   life    continued   as  before  for much    of
the year.   A   great   deal    of  internal    diversity   was accepted    or  even    enforced.   Local
languages,  material    culture or  social  customs were    permitted   so  long    as  they    did
not interfere   with    imperial    interests.  Particular  features    were    required,   such    as
the distinctive headgear    that    identified  subjects    as  members of  one or  another
society,     because     they    facilitated     keeping     tabs    on  things  (see   Costume).    In
imperial    business,   therefore,  selective   standardization was the order   of  the day.
The  material    stamp   of  imperial    presence    was     manifested  through     facilities,
insignia,    and     tools.  The     most    important   expression  occurred    in  the     Cuzco
heartland,  at  the reconstructed   capital and the royal   estates that    occupied    most    of
the  surrounding     lands   within  50–60   kilometers  (30–37  miles)  of  the     capital.
Elsewhere,   Inca    power   was     most    visible     in  the     network     of  more    than    2,000
administrative   facilities,     linked  by  the     road    system.     Access  to  the     largest
provincial  center  (e.g.,  Huánuco Pampa), the smallest    roadside    tambo,  or  way
station,    any storage facility,   or  the road    itself  was reserved    for those   on  approved
business.    In  the     centers’    design,     the     Incas   applied     their   notions     of  the     proper
layout  of  space   (e.g.,  dualism and quadripartition)    and activities  within  it. The
Incas’   distinctive     architectural   style   and     art     of  stonecutting    provided    an
unmistakable     mark    of  imperial    presence.   Entry,  movement,   sight   lines,  and
                    
                      bozica vekic
                      (Bozica Vekic)
                      
                    
                #1