Encyclopedia of the Incas

(Bozica Vekic) #1

U


UHLE,   MAX

Recognized as the “father of archaeology” in some of the South American
countries where he worked and lived for more than four decades (1892–
1933), Uhle was born in Dresden in 1856, and died in Loben, now Poland, in



  1. He was the first to introduce the idea of an Andean chronology, and his
    chronological proposals still retain much of their merit. The linchpin of his
    chronology is that the presence of Inca material remains is a historical fact.
    Uhle was well acquainted with Inca material as early as 1887 when an
    important collection from Cuzco arrived at the Royal Ethnological Museum
    at Berlin, where he worked.
    In 1892 Uhle began a project in Argentina to study the southeastern
    extension of the Inca Empire, where he visited and worked at many Inca sites,
    as well as in neighboring Bolivia. Inca archaeology and history still remained
    important topics in Peru, Chile, and Ecuador. Of special importance are his
    excavations at Tomebamba, an important Inca administrative center in
    Ecuador.
    His critical approach to Inca history was characterized by confronting data
    in early Colonial written sources with evidence from excavations. In 1905, he
    excavated in several places at and near Cuzco and identified the numerous
    sculptured rocks dotting the hills around Sacsahuaman as burial places of
    ancestors, related to kin groups (see Panacas), as well as Sun altars,
    providing a fairly complex and modern description of huacas (see Religion).
    He did not consider so-called intihuatanas (upright, carved stones) to be
    astronomical devices. Uhle was very interested in Inca social organization
    and its role in the ceque system. When applied to Inca “origins,” his
    chronological scheme proved the Incas’ modest origins (i.e., local Killke-style
    pottery; see Chronology, Inca) and their use of the Aymara language before
    adopting Quechua. At the time, many Peruvian historians criticized his ideas,
    but modern scholarship has shown many of them to be correct.


Further Reading

Free download pdf