In the previous edition of this magazine,
I discussed political aspects of relevance
to the wildlife industry and highlighted
movements for wildness, animal welfare
and social transformation. I also argued that
industry participants should consider aligning
theirbusinessstrategieswithoneormore
ofthesepoliticalmovements.Giventhis
edition’sthemeof‘Economics’,it is worth
UHÁHFWLQJLQ PRUHGHSWKRQ WKHOLQNV
betweenpolitics,economics,andsuccess
in thebusinessofwildlifemanagement.wildlife economy
0LFKDHO·W6DV5ROIHVT
here can be no doubt that economics is
closely linked to politics – so much so
that early classical economic thinkers
such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo
used to refer to their subject as ‘political economy’.
In practice, not much has changed, despite a
tendency of many modern-day academics to view
the two subjects as separate niches. All three focal
areas of economic concern – efficiency, equity
(fairness) and sustainability – are shaped by political
forces. But before thinking about these links, let us
first consider these three areas of economic concern
in terms of wildlife management. >>All three focal areas of economic
FRQFHUQ±HI¿FLHQF\HTXLW\ IDLUQHVV
and sustainability – are shaped by
political forces. Let us consider these
three areas of economic concern in
terms of wildlife management.$GDP6PLWK -XQH²-XO\
was a Scottish economist, also known as
¶7KH)DWKHURI(FRQRPLFV·
David Ricardo (18 April 1772 –
11 September 1823) was a British
political economist, one of the most
LQÁXHQWLDORIWKHFODVVLFDOHFRQRPLVWV