396 Making It New: 1900–1945
As Crane indicates here, his long poem “For the Marriage of Faustus and Helen”
grew directly out of his mystical experience and, in a sense, tried to recover it, to
make it and the knowledge it supplied available to every one of his readers. Faustus,
Crane explained, is “the symbol of ... the poetic and imaginative man of all times,”
Helen the symbol of an abstract “sense of beauty”; and the marriage between them
is seen, not as an event really, but as a continuing possibility – the moment of
communion between the soul and the spirit of essential Beauty which illuminates all
existence afterwards.
The poetry that followed “Faustus and Helen” includes “At Melville’s Tomb,” a
hymn of praise to the prophetic author of Moby-Dick, and “Royal Palm,” an evocative
description of the “green rustlings” of a palm tree that is also a symbolic account of
the imagination climbing to discovery of the absolute, “launched above / Mortality –
ascending emerald-bright.” But perhaps the most powerful expression of Crane’s
visionary impulse in his lyric poetry is “Voyages.” A series of six poems written
over three years, these are, as Crane explained at the time he was writing them, “love
poems” and “sea poems” too: the sea appears in them as a threat to the poet-lover
and as a rival, as a partner, an enemy, and eventually as a source of comfort and
vision. One reason for the constant presence of the sea in the sequence is that the
person to whom they are addressed was a sailor living temporarily in New York;
another, that the poet and his lover stayed together in an apartment overlooking
the harbor; and still another, that the sea was always a suggestive image for Crane.
Like Whitman and Melville, he used the sea to describe both the cruelty of this
“ broken” world and the mysterious “answers” that ultimately might make the world
whole again.
Apart from “Voyages,” Crane’s greatest achievement of his visionary years was
his attempt at what he termed a “Myth of America,” The Bridge. “I am concerned
with the future of America,” Crane wrote, “not because I think America has any
so-called par value as a state. ... It is only because I feel persuaded that there are
destined to be discovered certain as yet undefined spiritual qualities ... not to be
developed so completely elsewhere.” It is the old problem of the American dream
the poet poses, in a series of eight poems that follow the westward thrust of the
bridge into the body of the continent. The movement is one in time as well as space;
and as Crane moves across the continent he continually presents the reader with
the same question. How, he asks, can the ideal possibilities of people be liberated
so as to recover the kingdom of heaven on earth? How can an arc or bridge be
constructed between the world in which we live and the world of the imagination,
so that the life of the individual may assume a fresh nobility and the forms of the
community approximate to the divine? Having asked the question, he also tries to
answer it. For Crane is no less visionary in that he sees himself as an agent of
liberation, formulating in his work the new relationship between consciousness
and reality which will make the changes he requires possible. The Bridge, like so
much of Crane’s verse, offers a series of visionary acts intended to alter our minds –
to propose to us what Crane called “a new hierarchy of faith” – as a preliminary to
altering our surroundings. In “Proem: To Brooklyn Bridge,” for example, the opening
GGray_c04.indd 396ray_c 04 .indd 396 8 8/1/2011 7:53:54 AM/ 1 / 2011 7 : 53 : 54 AM