The Economist - UK (2019-06-01)

(Antfer) #1

26 Britain The EconomistJune 1st 2019


T


he newtown of Sherford, just east of
Plymouth, is “building futures”, ac-
cording to a large sign at its entrance. They
are futures with a distinctly old-fashioned
look, given that the development is largely
Georgian in style. Much of the town, which
is 10% complete and will in a couple of de-
cades be home to 12,000 people, consists of
terraced houses and mews buildings over-
looking village greens, in contrast to Ply-
mouth’s post-war suburbs of detached
homes in cul-de-sacs. Most quaintly of all,
Sherford has no bypass.
One of the central ideas of British tran-
sport planning, established with the publi-
cation of “Traffic in Towns” by Sir Colin Bu-
chanan, an urban planner, in 1963, is to
separate cars and people. To keep traffic
flowing and preserve peaceful town cen-
tres, planners built bypasses, roads send-
ing motorists speedily around the edge of
towns rather than crawling through them.
People driving into the centre would park
at multi-storey car parks and walk to a pe-
destrianised high-street, sometimes via
underpasses as traffic rumbled overhead.
Now planners are bringing cars and pe-
destrians back together. Sherford is one of
several new towns being designed without
a bypass. Instead, the main road doubles
up as a high street that funnels traffic into
the town rather than round it. Nansledan, a
new extension to Newquay, has no bypass.
And in Lawley, which reaches out from Tel-
ford, engineers have replaced a big round-
about that spun traffic away from the town
with an urban boulevard that draws it in.
Some existing bypasses are being bull-
dozed. A dual-carriageway which took traf-
fic around Ashford, in Kent, has been torn
up. Birmingham’s inner ring-road was
turned into an ordinary street as pedestri-
an underpasses were removed, putting
cars and people back on the same level.
And although a number of new bypasses
have been commissioned by the govern-
ment’s Housing Infrastructure Fund, these
roads are mainly to open up sites for new
developments, rather than steer motorists
away from them.
There are two reasons why the conven-
tional bypass is falling out of favour. One is
a desire to bail out high-street shops,
which are losing business to online retail-
ers and out-of-town malls. In its planning
submission for Sherford, the developer,
Red Tree, argued that “planning policies
and traffic rules have worked against [high

streets] by taking all the uses they provide
and relocating them on the edge of town for
the single benefit of the motorist.” Andrew
Cameron, a transport consultant on the
Sherford project, says he wants to “use the
traffic to support shops and businesses, by
letting it into the town on our terms.” Sher-
ford’s main road has low speed limits and
tight corners to slow down drivers.
The other reason is local opposition.

Some campaigners argue that bypasses
simply open up land for development and
destroy natural habitats (they also ruin the
view). The Shropshire Wildlife Trust re-
cently challenged a detour round Shrews-
bury on the same grounds. Opponents of a
proposed bypass round Hereford claim
that most of the traffic approaching the
town is heading for the centre anyway. By-
passes face ever more roadblocks. 7

SHERFORD
Planners used to keep cars away from
towns. Now they are inviting them in

Urban planning

End of the road


T


he centreof Lancing,anovergrown
village of 19,000 on the south coast of
England, is unremarkable: not the scene
of a retail apocalypse, but not particular-
ly inviting either. In addition to the three
ps—a post office, a Pizza Hut and a pound
shop—the high street is home to a couple
of bookies and a handful of charity
shops. It needs more footfall to stay alive,
says Helen Plant, the parish council
clerk, or administrative head. But for
people to come into the centre, they need
to know it is there, she adds.
Two major roads cross Lancing. The
a27 runs though the northern end. The
a259, a lovely but unloved trunk road
connecting Folkestone with Emsworth,
runs along the coast. Both bypass the
centre. Lancing Council’s strategy was to
commission some branding, put up
some signs off the a259, and make the
place a bit jollier—more “seasidey”, in Ms
Plant’s description—in order to persuade
traffic to pass through rather than by.
One idea was to put up bunting. But
the streetlights are owned by sse, an
energy company, which forbids “any

attachmentsthattether a column”, espe-
cially bunting. Another was to install
flags on the buildings in the village cen-
tre. But that would involve tracking down
every private and public owner and
seeking their permission.
Banners on the streetlights remain an
option, but are expensive and time-
consuming. The lamp posts must be
tested to ensure they can carry the weight
of the banners and won’t topple over in
high winds. The chap who did the tests
for Christmas lights charged £575. A new
test would cost at least as much. And
then there is the three-stage application,
which takes four weeks.
The parish council drew up a brief
and three local graphic designers sent in
ideas. In May the winning slogan was
unveiled on the council’s Facebook page:
it read “Lancing-on-Sea” and “Be at the
centre” set around an illustration of an
idyllic English village. “We now need to
know what yourthoughts are on this
beforethe design is actually put to use,”
the post insisted.
The people of Lancing let their
thoughts be known. One responded, “I
never want to offend but this ‘banner’ is
truly terrible!” Another commentator
noted that it seemed to be missing a
Pizza Hut logo. Most were baffled by the
putative renaming of Lancing as Lanc-
ing-on-Sea. “Unfortunately, it is the
name that people picked up on,” says Ms
Plant, explaining that the “on-Sea” bit
was simply branding, not a formal name-
change. Given the response, “I think
Lancing-on-Sea is a no,” she adds.
Still, the parish council remains
optimistic. There are plans to improve
the road layout and make it friendlier for
pedestrians. An old hotel has been reno-
vated. And the town is trying to create a
“history trail” with blue plaques—if it
can find enough history. “There is noth-
ing of obvious historic value,” says Ms
Plant ruefully. But there are “lots of his-
toric connections”.

Nothingtoseahere


Regeneration

LANCING
The travails of a town trying to tempt traffic

Turn left for the Pizza Hut
Free download pdf