War with Mexico 305complied and in May 1846 Polk notified Great Britain
that he intended to terminate the joint occupation.
The British then decided to compromise. Officials
of the Hudson’s Bay Company had become alarmed
by the rapid growth of the American settlement in the
Willamette Valley. By 1845 some 5,000 people had
poured into the region, whereas the country north of
the Columbia contained no more than 750 British
subjects. A clash between the groups could have but
one result. The company decided to shift its base from
the Columbia to Vancouver Island. And British
experts outside the company reported that the
Oregon country could not possibly be defended in
case of war. Thus, when Polk accompanied the one-
year notice with a hint that he would again consider a
compromise, the British foreign secretary, Lord
Aberdeen, hastily suggested Polk’s earlier proposal,
dividing the Oregon territory along the forty-ninth
parallel. Polk, abandoning his belligerent attitude,
agreed. The treaty followed that line from the Rockies
to Puget Sound, but Vancouver Island, which extends
below the line, was left entirely to the British, so that
both nations retained free use of the Strait of Juan de
Fuca. Although some northern Democrats accused
Polk of treachery because he had failed to fight for all
of Oregon, the treaty so obviously accorded with the
national interest that the Senate approved it by a large
majority in June 1846. Polk was then free to take up
the Texas question in earnest.
John O’Sullivan, Annexationat
http://www.myhistorylab.comWar with Mexico
One reason for the popularity of the Oregon com-
promise was that the country was already at war with
Mexico and wanted no trouble with Great Britain.
TheMexican Warhad broken out in large measure
because of the expansionist spirit, and the confidence
born of its overwhelming advantages of size and
wealth certainly encouraged the United States to
bully Mexico. In addition, Mexico had defaulted on
debts owed the United States, which caused some
people to suggest using force to obtain the money.
But Mexican pride was also involved. Texas had been
independent for the better part of a decade, and
Mexico had made no serious effort to reconquer it;
nevertheless, Mexico never recognized its indepen-
dence and promptly broke off diplomatic relations
when the United States annexed the republic.ReadtheDocumentGulf of
MexicoMiss
issippiR.Rio
Gr
an
deRedR.ArkansasR
.Gu
lf
of
Ca
lif
or
ni
aPA
C
IF
IC
O
C
EA
NNue
cesR.Santa
BarbaraMonterrey
Sept., 1846Sonoma
June, 1846
San FranciscoLos Angeles
Jan., 1847San DiegoEl PasoMazatlanOccupied by
U.S. Navy,Nov. 1847La Paz
San Jose
San Lucas
TampicoResaca de la PalmaVeracruzPueblaJalapaSan Luis PotosiChihuahua
Feb., 1847Las VegasSalt Lake
CityNew Orleans
San AntonioCorpus ChristiSanta Fé
AlbuquerqueAnnexed by United States in 1845
U.S. forces
Mexican forces
U.S. victory
Mexican victoryEl Brazito
Dec., 1846Monterrey
Sept., 1846
Buena Vista
Feb. 1847San Pasqual
Dec., 1846Cerro Gordo
April, 1847Mexico City
Sept., 1847Palo Alto
May, 1846MatamorosSc
ottTay
lorSant
aAnn
aSa
nt
aAnn
S a
an
ta
An
naTaylorKearnyFrémontFré
montU.S
.N
av
yU.S
.Na
vyScottBENT’S FORTFORT LEAVENWORTH
UNITED
STATESMEXICOUNORGANIZED
TERRITORYINDIAN
TERRITORYREPUBLIC OF
TEXAS
(1836–45)DISPUTED
BY TEXAS
AND
MEXICOKearnyThe War with Mexico, 1846–1848The War with Mexico required considerable coordination of far-flung
military and naval operations.