463
This “hypothetical” water-based transportation system
might have been as efficient as the railroads. In 1890, the cost
of transporting wheat from Chicago to New York City was
5.2 cents per ton-mile by rail, but only 1.4 cents by water.
Fogel estimated that a water-based transportation system
would have saved $38 million in carrying costs annually,
though there would have been additional costs in ware-
house construction and spoilage (boats are slower than
trains). The railroads, in short, were not “indispensable” to
move foodstuffs to eastern cities.
For decades, Fogel’s argument was regarded by most
historians as mathematical trickery: the fact is that railroads
and industry emerged nearly simultaneously in all industrial
nations: Is that not proof of the centrality of railroads to indus-
trial development? In 2003, however, historian Richard White
showed that in the late nineteenth century the railroad com-
panies were engaged in massive fraud and deception—
including controlling the news media in order to persuade
investors to buy their stocks. This ensured enormous waste
and inefficiency.
Yet the railroads stimulated economic development in
other ways. Their demand for iron and steel jump-started the
iron and steel industries, crucial for manufacturing and urban
construction. The development of powerful locomotives
gave rise to advances in steam and machine technology.
Perhaps most important, the railroads promoted effective
systems of corporate organization that stimulated economic
development throughout the economy.
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
L.Sup
erior
.L
Mi
ch
iga
n
L.H
uro
n
L.Eri
e
L.
Ontario
CANADA
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Washington
Detroit Buffalo
Minneapolis
Chicago
St Louis
Memphis
New Orleans
Charleston
Kansas City
Toledo Cleveland
Pittsburgh
Cincinnati
Savannah
Feasible commercial agriculture
Navigable river
Existing canal
Proposed canal
Probable major center
of grain shipment
A Hypothetical Water-Based Transportation System, 1890If the nation’s transportation system had been
based on canal construction, the Mississippi River basin would have been the nation’s breadbasket, and the
central plains would have been less significant.
Questions for Discussion
■Why was Chicago the largest center of grain shipment
in 1890?
■Why was Chicago not included as a “probable major
center” of grain shipment in a “hypothetical water-
based transportation system?”
■Interior North Carolina, an important source of wheat
and corn in 1890, would not have figured in a water-
based system. Why?
■How do counterfactual assertions promote historical
understanding?