438 UNIT 4 MESOAMERICAN CULTURAL FEATURES
BRICKER, VICTORIAR. (ed.) 1992 Epigraphy.Handbook of
Middle American Indians, Supplement 5. Austin:
University of Texas Press.
CAMPBELL, HOWARD, LEIGHBINFORD, MIGUELBARTOLOMÉ,
and ALICIABARABAS(eds.) 1993 Zapotec Struggles: His-
tories, Politics, and Representations from Juchitán, Oax-
aca.Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
CAMPBELL, LYLE 1977 Quichean Linguistic Prehistory.Uni-
versity of California Publications in Linguistics, 81.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
CAMPBELL, LYLE1979 Middle American Languages. In
The Languages of Native America: Historical and Com-
parative Assessment,edited by Lyle Campbell and Mar-
ianne Mithun. Austin: University of Texas Press.
CAMPBELL, LYLE, TERRENCEKAUFMAN, and THOMASC.
SMITH-STARK1986 Mesoamerica as a Linguistic Area.
Language62:530–570.
COWAN, GEORGEM. 1948 Mazateco whistle speech. Lang-
uage24:280–286. Reprinted in Dell Hymes, ed.,
Language in Culture and Society,pp. 305–311. New
York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
HILL, JANEH., and KENNETHC. HILL 1986 Speaking Mex-
icano.Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
JUSTESON, JOHNS., and TERRENCEKAUFMAN1993 A Deci-
pherment of epi-Olmec Hieroglyphic Writing. Science
271:1703–1711.
KAUFMAN, TERRENCE1991 “Mesoamerican Languages.”
In Encyclopaedia Britannica,vol. 22, pp. 785–792.
SAKIYAMA, OSAMU, (ed.) 2001 Lectures on Endangered
Languages: 2. From Kyoto Conference 2000–. 2 vols.
Publication C003.kyoto:ELPR.
SUÁREZ, JORGE 1983 The Mesoamerican Indian Languages.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
URCIDSERRANO, JAVIER 2001 Zapotec Hieroglyphic Writing.
Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks.Glottochronology has been tested against hieroglyphic data in the case of Mayan
and Mixe-Zoquean. Given that the underlying assumptions of the method are not uni-
versally accepted, it is remarkable how well the glottochronological dates fit the hi-
eroglyphic evidence. In Mesoamerica, it appears that glottochronology provides a
rather reliable guide for historical chronologies.FINAL COMMENT
The languages that we have just described are crucially tied to our understanding of
the Mesoamerican cultural tradition. When we attempt to understand the history of
this region, the common properties of Mesoamerican languages attest to the long pe-
riods of interactions among different Mesoamerican peoples, and the hieroglyphic
texts provide us with insights into ancient political systems (see Chapter 1). Glot-
tochronology and reconstruction allow us to form hypotheses about the cultures and
movements of the ancient peoples of Mexico and Central America.
The indigenous languages are also central to understanding preconquest, colonial,
and contemporary Mesoamerican views of the world. The voices of native peoples in
Mesoamerica have been expressed in both native and colonial languages, but the
choice of languages has rarely been neutral. Choosing one or another language or di-
alect conveys complex messages about colonialism, community, and ethnic identity.
Finally, not only has language served as a medium for the expression of the his-
tories, religions, and dreams of Mesoamerican people, but it has also acted as a con-
servative force in shaping the content of these expressions as well. Language is one
of the strongest links between the achievements of ancient Mesoamerica and the
struggles and accomplishments of the peoples in this part of the modern world.SUGGESTED READINGS