Public Speaking

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

295


Chapter 1


  1. Jensen, K. K., & Harris, V. (1999). The
    public speaking portfolio. Communica-
    tion Education, 48 , 221–227.

  2. Smith, D. (1996, February). Globaliza-
    tion of the general education curriculum.
    Discussion leader. George Fox Univer-
    sity, Newberg, OR.

  3. Galvin, K. M., & Cooper, P. J. (2000).
    Perceptual filters: Culture, family, and
    gender. In K. M. Galvin & P. J. Cooper
    (Eds.), Making connections: Readings
    in relational communication (2nd ed.,
    pp. 32–33). Los Angeles: Roxbury.

  4. Collier, M. J. (2006). WSCA presidential
    address: Cultural positioning, reflexivity,
    and transformative third spaces. Western
    Journal of Communication, 70 , 263–269.

  5. Conrad, C. (1994). Strategic organi-
    zational communication: Toward the
    twenty-first century (3rd ed., p. 31).
    Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

  6. Gray, G. W. (1946). The precepts
    of Kagmenmi [sic] and Ptah-hotep.
    Quarterly Journal of Speech, 31 , 446–454.

  7. Halledén, P. (2005). What is Arab-
    Islamic rhetoric? Rethinking the history
    of Muslim oratory art and homiletics.
    International Journal of Middle East
    Studies, 37 , 19–38. doi: 10.1017.
    S0020743805050038.

  8. Dao De Jing 81.185 is quoted in Xing,
    L. (1998). Rhetoric in ancient China, fifth
    to third century, B.C.E.: A comparison with
    classical Greek rhetoric. Columbia, SC:
    University of South Carolina Press, p. 87.

  9. Hart, R. P., & Burks, D. O. (1972).
    Rhetorical sensitivity and social
    interaction. Speech Monographs, 39 , 90.

  10. Pearce, W. B. (1989). Communication
    and the human condition. Carbondale:
    Southern Illinois University Press.

  11. Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy:
    The technologizing of the word. New York,
    NY: Methuen.

  12. Clark, R. A., & Jones, D. (2001). A
    comparison of traditional and online
    formats in a public speaking course.
    Communication Education, 50 (2),
    109–124.

  13. Hofstede, G. (n.d.). Dimensions of
    national cultures. Geert Hofstede web-
    site. Retrieved from http://www.geerthofstede.
    nl/dimensions-of-national-cultures.

  14. Oddou, G. (2006, Spring). Hofstede’s
    dimensions of culture. California State
    University, San Marcos. MGMT 461.
    Retrieved from courses.csusm.edu/-
    mgmt461go/Hofstede-correlations.doc.

  15. FIU Oral Presentation Lab. (n.d.).
    Cultural issues and public address.
    Miami: Florida International University.
    Retrieved from http://opl.fiu.edu/
    cultural.htm.

  16. Lai, A. (2006, June). Eye on religion:
    Cultural signs and caring for Chinese
    patients. Southern Medical Journal, 99 ,
    688–689.

  17. Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., McCroskey,
    J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991).
    Willingness to communicate, commu-
    nication apprehension, introversion,
    and self-reported communication
    competence: Finnish and American
    Comparisons. Communication Research
    Reports, 8 , 54–65.

  18. Marsella, A. J. (1993). Counseling
    and psychotherapy with Japanese
    Americans: Cross-cultural con-
    siderations. American Journal of
    Orthopsychiatry, 63 , 200–208. ISSN:



  19. Klopf, D. W. (1997). Cross-cultural
    apprehension research: Procedures
    and comparisons. In J. A. Daly, J. C.
    McCroskey, J. Ayers, T. Hopf, & D. M.
    Ayres (Eds.), Avoiding communication:
    Shyness, reticence, and communication
    apprehension (2nd ed., pp. 269–284).
    Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

  20. Messenger, J. (1960). Anang proverb
    riddles. Journal of American Folklore,
    73 , 235.

  21. Weider, D. L., & Pratt, S. (1990).
    On being a recognizable Indian.
    In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Intercultural
    communication and intercultural contacts
    (pp. 45–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  22. Jenefsky, C. (1996). Public speaking as
    empowerment at Visionary University.
    Communication Education, 45 , 343–355.


See also Jaasma, M. A. (1997, Summer).
Classroom apprehension: Does being
male or female make a difference?
Communication Reports, 10 , 218–228.


  1. Clasen, P., & Lee, R. (2006). Teaching
    in a sanitized world: An exploration
    of the suburban scene in public com-
    munication pedagogy. Communication
    Education, 55 , 438–463.

  2. Lind, S. J. (2012). Teaching digital
    oratory: Public Speaking 2.0. Com-
    munication Teacher, 26 (3), 163–169. doi:
    10.1080/17404622.2012.659193.

  3. Stewart, E. C., & Bennett, M. J. (1991).
    American cultural patterns: A cross-cultural
    perspective (rev. ed.). Yarmouth, ME:
    Intercultural Press.

  4. Evans, R. W., & Avery, P. G. (1999,
    September/October). Taboo topics:
    Cultural restraint on teaching social
    issues. Social Studies, 90 (5), 218–225.
    ISSN: 00377996.

  5. DeJong, J., Jawad, R., Mortagy, I.,
    & Shepard, B. (2005). The sexual
    and reproductive health of young
    people in the Arab countries and
    Iran. Reproductive Health Matters,
    13 (25), 49–59. doi: 10.1016/
    S0968-8080(05)25181-9.

  6. Sayer, D. (2010). Who’s afraid of the
    dead? Archaeology, modernity, and the
    death taboo. World Archaeology, 42 (3),
    481–491.

  7. Ugwu-Oju, D. (1993, November 14).
    Pursuit of happiness. The New York
    Times Magazine.

  8. Pearce, Communication.

  9. California State Senate. (2002,
    January 20, last updated). Definition
    of critical thinking. Quoted on B.
    Dowden, Philosophy 4, California State
    University Sacramento. Retrieved from
    http://www.csus.edu/indiv/d/dowdenb/4/
    ct-def/def-of-ct.htm.

  10. King, A., & Kuypers, J. (2013).
    Scholarly definitions of rhetoric.
    Retrieved from http://www.americanrhetoric.
    com/rhetoricdefinitions.htm.

  11. The first three definitions can be found
    at the previous site.


references


references


Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Free download pdf