RefeRences (^299)
299
- EDUCAUSE. (2008). 7 things you
should know about lecture capture.
EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. ELI
7044.pdf. - Edwards, R., & McDonald, J. L. (1993).
Schema theory and listening. In Wolvin
& Coakley, Perspectives, 60–77. - Bierhorst, J. (1985). The mythology of
North America. New York, NY: William
Morrow. - Daniel, J., & Smitherman, G. (1990).
How I got over: Communication
dynamics in the black community.
In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Intercultural-
communication and intercultural contacts
(pp. 45–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. See
also Smith, A. L. (Molefi Asanti). (1970).
Socio-historical perspectives of black
oratory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61 ,
264–269. - Sitkaram, K. S., & Cogdell, R. T. (1976).
Foundations of intercultural communication.
Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill. - Kiewitz, C., Weaver, J. B. III, Brosius,
H.-B., & Weimann, G. (1997). Cultural
differences in listening style prefer-
ences: A comparison of young adults in
Germany, Israel, and the United States.
International Journal of Public Opinion
Research, 9 , 233–248. - Ridge, A. (1993). A perspective of
listening skills. In Wolvin & Coakley,
Perspectives, 1–14. - Snyder, M. D. (2002, March/April).
Free speech and the ‘heckler’s veto.’
Academe 88 (2), 01902946. - Epstein, J. (2013, May 23). Code Pink
heckler interrupts Obama counter-
terror speech. Politico 44. Politico.
Retrieved from http://www.politico.com/
politico44/2013/05/code-pink-
heckler-interrupts-obama-drone-
speech-164687.html. - Bruce, M. (2013, June 4). Michelle
Obama, heckled by gay rights
advocate, threatens to leave event.
ABC Early Morning News. Retrieved
from http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/
politics/2013/06/first-lady-heckled-by-
gay-rights-advocate-threatens-to-leave-
event/. - Boyd, S. D. (2001, October). The
human side of teaching: Effective
listening. Techniques, 76 (7), 60. - Goodman, G., & Esterly, G. (1990).
Questions—the most popular piece
of language. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Bridges
not walls: A book about interpersonal
communication (9th ed., pp. 69–79).
New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37. Becker, C. B. (1986). Reasons for the
lack of argumentation and debate in
the Far East. International Journal of
International Relations, 10 (1), 75–92. doi:
10.1016/0147-1767(86)90035-0; see
also Sueda, K. (1995). Differences in the
perception of face: Chinese mien-tzu
and Japanese mentsu. World Communica-
tion, 24 (1), 23–31.
38. Anonymous reviewer. (2004).
Chapter 5- Christensen, M. D. (1998, March). An
idea is only the bait. The Writer, 111 ,
20–21. - Bitzer, L. F. (1999). The rhetorical situ-
ation. In J. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit, &
S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary rhetori-
cal theory: A reader (pp. 217–225). New
York, NY: Guilford; see also Vatz, R. E.
(1999). The myth of the rhetorical situ-
ation. In Lucaites, Condit, & Caudill,
Contemporary rhetorical theory, 226–231. - McKeon, R. (1998). Creativity and the
commonplace. In T. B. Ferrell (Ed.),
Landmark essays on contemporary rhetoric
(pp. 33–41). Mahwah, NJ: Hermagoras
Press. - Michaud, J. (2013, December 22). Sweet
morsels: A history of the chocolate-chip
cookie. The New Yorker. Retrieved from
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/cul-
ture/2013/12/sweet-morsels-a-history-
of-the-chocolate-chip-cookie.html. - Weinstein, B. (2008, January 15).
The ethics of talking politics at work.
BusinessWeek. Retrieved from http://www.
businessweek.com/managing/content/
jan2008/ca20080115_994641.htm. - Murray, D. M. (1998, May). Write what
you don’t know. The Writer, 111 , 7–9. - Christensen, An idea.
- Daisak, W. (2008, January). What not to
talk about. Toastmasters International.
Retrieved from http://www.toastmasters.org/
ToastmastersMagazine/ToastmasterAr-
chive/2008/January/Articles/WhatNot-
toTalkAbout.aspx. - Grant, H. (2007, January). Sabina Xhosa
and the new shoes. Address delivered
November 1, 2006, at the IBM Lecture,
Westminster College, Fulton, Missouri.
Vital Speeches of the Day, 73 (1), 36–40. - Scofield, S. (1999, August). An end to
writer’s block. The Writer, 111 , 7–9. - Augustine. (397–426, 1958). On
Christian doctrine: Book IV (D. W.
Robertson Jr., Trans.). New York, NY:
Liberal Arts Press. - Campbell, G. (1963). The philosophy of
rhetoric (L. Bitzer, Ed.). Carbondale:
Southern Illinois University Press.
(Original work published 1776) - Monroe, A. H. (1962). Principles and
types of speech (5th ed.). Chicago: Scott
Foresman. - Gwynne, R. (2005, March 12, last up-
dated). Topic organization. University
of Tennessee Knoxville. Accessed from
http://web.utk.edu/gwynne/topic_orga-
nization.html. - Borough of Manhattan Community
College. (n.d.). What’s the difference
between a specific purpose and a central
idea? e-tutoring FAQS. City University
of New York. Retrieved from www.
bmcc.cuny.edu/faq/faq_detail.
jsp?faq_id=715&course_id=156. - Gwynne, Topic organization.
- Anonymous reviewer. (2005). College
of Marin. - Griffin, C. W. (1998). Improving
students’ writing strategies: Knowing
versus doing. College Teaching, 46 , 48–52.
Chapter 6- Holman, P. (1970). The psychology of
speakers and audiences. Glenview, IL:
Scott Foresman. - Bitzer, L. F. (1999). The rhetorical
situation. In J. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit,
& S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary rhetori-
cal theory: A reader (pp. 217–225). New
York, NY: Guilford. See also Garrett, M.,
& Xiao, X. (1993, Spring). The rhetorical
situation revisited. RSQ: Rhetorical Society
Quarterly, 23 (2), 30–40. - Garrett & Xiao, The rhetorical
situation. - Psychologists have written about
audience motivations for decades.
An early book was Hollingsworth,
H. L. (1935). The psychology of audiences.
New York, NY: American Book. - Manson, N. C. (2012). Making
sense of spin. Journal of Applied
Philosophy, 29 (3), 200–213. doi:
10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00566.x. - Editorial. (2006, July 3). Pander-monium:
Our view: Congress is angling for votes,
not solving problems. Spokesman-Review
(Spokane, WA). Retrieved from InfoTrac
College Edition. - Simon, P., quoted in Editorial,
Pander-monium. - Reider, J. (2008). The Word of the Lord
is upon me: The righteous performance
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.