Aids to Audience Decision Making 189123 Pan, B., Zhang, L., & Law, R. (2013). The complex matter of online hotel choice. Cornell Hospitality
Quarterly , 54 (1), 74–83.
124 Peterson, E. B., Thomsen, S., Lindsay, G., & John, K. (2010). Adolescents’ attention to traditional and
graphic tobacco warning labels: An eye-tracking approach. Journal of Drug Education , 40 (3), 227–244.
125 Strasser, A. A., Tang, K. Z., Romer, D., Jepson, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2012). Graphic warning labels
in cigarette advertisements: Recall and viewing patterns. American Journal of Preventive Medicine , 43 (1),
41–47.
126 Katzman, N., & Nyenhuis, J. (1972). Color vs. black-and-white effects on learning, opinion, and atten-
tion. AV Communication Review , 20 (1), 16–28.
127 See n54, Kosslyn (1994).
128 Levasseur, D. G., & Kanan Sawyer, J. (2006). Pedagogy meets PowerPoint: A research review of the effects
of computer-generated slides in the classroom. The Review of Communication , 6 (1–2), 101–123.
129 Peeck, J. (1987). The role of illustrations in processing and remembering illustrated text. In D. M. Wil-
lows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: Basic research (Vol. 1, pp. 115–151). New York:
Springer-Verlag.
130 Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in
prose. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: Basic research (Vol. 1,
pp. 51–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.
131 Smith, S. M., & Shaffer, D. R. (2000). Vividness can undermine or enhance message processing: The
moderating role of vividness congruency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 26 (7), 769–779.
132 Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2007). How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of
visual salience in scene perception? Perception , 36 (8), 1123–1138.
Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not
account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer,
W. S. Murray & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537–562). Oxford, UK:
Elsevier.
Underwood, G., & Foulsham, T. (2006). Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye move-
ments when inspecting pictures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 59 (11), 1931–1949.
133 Allen, D. G., Biggane, J. E., Pitts, M., Otondo, R., & Van Scotter, J. (2013). Reactions to recruitment web
sites: Visual and verbal attention, attraction, and intentions to pursue employment. Journal of Business and
Psychology , 28 (3), 263–285.
134 Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual inter-
est moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology , 99 (3),
597–610.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
135 See n18, Just & Carpenter (1987).
136 See n41, Redish (1980).
137 Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review , 76 (4), 387–404.
Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive
Psychology , 3 (3), 472–517.
Just, M. A., & Clark, H. H. (1973). Drawing inferences from the presuppositions and implications of
affirmative and negative sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior , 12 (1), 21–31.
138 Chall, J. S. (1958). Readability: An appraisal of research and application. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univer-
sity. Reprinted 1974. Epping, UK: Bowker Publishing Company.
Klare, G. M. (1963). The measurement of readability. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Klare, G. R. (1984). Readability. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of
reading research (pp. 681–744). New York: Longman.
139 See n18, Just & Carpenter (1987).
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychologi-
cal Bulletin , 124 (3), 372–422.
140 Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology , 32 (3), 221–233.
141 Gunning, R. (1964). How to take the fog out of writing. Chicago: Dartnell.
142 Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27 , 11–20,
37–54.
143 Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne Jr, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability for-
mulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel (No.
RBR-8–75). Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training Command.