Heuristics and Biases in Audience Decision Making 241
Notes
1 Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive
judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive
judgment (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2 Cobos, P. L., Almaraz, J., & Garcia-Madruga, J. A. (2003). An associative framework for probability judg-
ment: An application to biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 29 (1),
80–96.
Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflection and reflexion: A social cogni-
tive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social
psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 199–249). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Whittlesea, B. W. (1997). Production, evaluation, and preservation of experiences: Constructive process-
ing in remembering and performance tasks. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation:
Advances in research and theory (Vol. 37, pp. 211–264). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3 Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of
Psychology , 58 , 259–289.
4 Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2000). The positive feeling of familiarity: Mood as an information
processing regulation mechanism. In H. Bless & J. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective
experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 240–261). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experi-
ence. Journal of Consciousness Studies , 6 (6–7), 15–51.
Schwarz, N. (2004). Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of
Consumer Psychology, 14 (4), 332–348.
5 Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on process-
ing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 86 (2), 205–218.
6 Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W.
Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). New York: Guilford Press.
Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological
evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81 (6),
989–1000.
7 Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition , 11 (2), 123–141.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science ,
185 (4157), 1124–1131.
8 Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rational-
ity. Psychological Review , 103 (4), 650–669.
Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002). The availability heuristic revisited: Ease of recall and content of
recall as distinct sources of information. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and
biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 103–119). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cog-
nitive Psychology , 5 (2), 207–232.
9 Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological
Review , 93 (2), 136–153.
Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology , 59 (6), 1101–1110.
10 Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y.
Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: Guilford Press.
See n9, Kahneman & Varey (1990).
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in
probability judgment. Psychological Review , 90 (4), 293–315.
11 Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (2001). The effects of value-framing on political judgment
and reasoning. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media
and our understanding of the social world (pp. 227–243). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Simon, H. A., & Hayes, J. R. (1976). The understanding process: Problem isomorphs. Cognitive Psychology ,
8 (2), 165–190.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science ,
211 (4481), 453–458.
