Persuasive Communication - How Audiences Decide. 2nd Edition

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1
Person Perception in Audience Decision Making 265

decide a judge is harsh when comparing her to lenient judges and then mistakenly remember her


as very harsh when later comparing her to moderately harsh judges.


Audience Expectations About Professionals Playing Their Roles


Audiences may penalize professionals whose traits do not fi t their role schemata. A study of whole-


sale drug salespeople and retail pharmacist buyers demonstrates that buyer loyalty to a given supplier


is negatively related to the degree to which a salesperson’s actual behaviors differ from the buyer’s


role expectation of them.^43 Salespeople who are uncertain about the best way to fulfi ll their cus-


tomers’ role expectations suffer from what is called role ambiguity. The greater the salesperson’s role


ambiguity, the poorer their sales performance.^44


When audiences are asked to evaluate an individual’s leadership abilities, they automatically draw

on their leader schemata.^45 Audiences make leadership judgments by activating a leader schema and


matching the attributes of the individual they are evaluating against the attributes in their leader


schema.^46 The better the match, the more favorable the audience’s leadership perceptions.^47


Audiences also perceive leaders who behave in ways that match their leader schemata to be

more effective than those whose behaviors do not match.^48 A manager who fails to conform to


her employees’ schemata for a good business leader will not be perceived as a leader in her organi-


zation.^49 In one leadership study, audience members watched videos of groups in which a target


person’s behavior varied on two dimensions: prototypicality of leadership behavior and frequency


of leadership behavior. Both dimensions signifi cantly affected the audience’s leadership ratings of


the target person.^50 Even more important to business professionals is the fi nding that managers who


fail to conform to their employees’ leader schemata tend to be less effective as managers.^51


Types of Role Schemata


Occupation Schemata: How Audiences Evaluate Professionals


Audiences have role schemata for all types of professionals: for managers, teachers, engineers, politi-


cians, as well as for those involved in other more specialized occupations.^52 For example, industry


analysts have a clear role schema for investor-relations representatives that is very different from


their role schema for senior managers.^53


As might be expected, recruiters have a highly differentiated and reliable understanding of the

personality traits and emotional characteristics specifi c occupations require.^54 For example, recruit-


ers expect a good applicant for an advertising position to be thrill seeking, impulsive, changeable,


attention seeking, and fun loving. Conversely, they expect a good applicant for an accounting posi-


tion to be meek, defi niteness seeking, and orderly. And they expect applicants for supervisory and


coaching positions to be dominant, ambitious, aggressive, and persistent. Interestingly, recruiters’


expectations are a good match with applicants’ self-reported measures of personality and vocational


interests.^55


Leader Schemata: How Audiences Evaluate Leaders


Decision criteria in leader schemata are widely shared by people of all ages and backgrounds.^56


Even as early as fi rst grade, children can clearly differentiate leaders from nonleaders and can articu-


late the criteria they use to distinguish them.^57 Studies of group decision making also indicate there


is substantial agreement among group members about which member of the group is its leader and


which members are not.^58

Free download pdf