304 Understanding Intuitive Decision Making
324 Kalin, R., & Rayko, D. (1980). The social significance of speech in the job interview. In R. N. St. Clair &
H. Giles (Eds.), The social and psychological contexts of language (pp. 39–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
325 Gaertner, S., & Bickman, L. (1971). Effects of race on the elicitation of helping behavior: The wrong
number technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 20 (2), 218–222.
326 Purnell, T., Idsardi, W., & Baugh, J. (1999). Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English
dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 18 (1), 10–30.
327 Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology , 77 (6), 1296–1312.
328 Lavandera, B. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society , 7 , 171–182.
329 Sankoff, D., Thibault, P., & Berube, H. (1978). Semantic field variability. In D. Sankoff (Ed.), Linguistic
variation: Models and methods (pp. 23–44). New York: Academic Press.
330 Guy, G. R., & Vonwiller, J. (1984). The meaning of an intonation in Australian English. Australian Journal
of Linguistics , 4 (1), 1–17.
331 Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford, UK: University Pennsylvania Press.
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech ,
82 (1), 32–64.
332 Giles, H. (1973). Communicative effectiveness as a function of accented speech. Speech Monographs , 40 (4),
330–331.
333 Giles, H., & Sassoon, C. (1983). The effect of speaker’s accent, social class background and message style
on British listeners’ social judgements. Language & Communication , 3 (3), 305–313.
334 Thakerar, J. N., & Giles, H. (1981). They are—so they spoke: Noncontent speech stereotypes. Language &
Communication , 1 (2–3), 255–261.
335 Giles, H., & Niedzielski, N. (1998). German sounds awful, but Italian is beautiful. In L. Bauer & P. Trud-
gill (Eds.), Language myths (pp. 85–93). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
336 Salvadori, L., van Swol, L. M., & Sniezek, J. A. (2001). Information sampling and confidence within
groups and Judge advisor systems. Communication Research , 28 (6), 737–771.
Thomas, J. P., & McFadyen, R. G. (1995). The confidence heuristic: A game-theoretic analysis. Journal of
Economic Psychology , 16 (1), 97–113.
Van Swol, L. M. & Sniezek, J. A. (2002). Trust me, I’m and expert: Trust and confidence and acceptance of expert
advice. Paper presented at the 8th Conference on Behavioral Decision Research in Management (BDRM),
Chicago.
337 Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine
and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes , 88 (2), 563–586.
338 See n102, Blankenship & Holtgraves (2005).
Burrell, N. A., & Koper, R. J. (1998). The efficacy of powerful/powerless language on attitudes and source
credibility. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through metaanalysis (pp. 203–215).
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Holtgraves, T., & Lasky, B. (1999). Linguistic power and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychol-
ogy , 18 (2), 196–205.
339 Hahn, R. W., & Clayton, S. D. (1996). The effects of attorney presentation style, attorney gender, and juror
gender on juror decisions. Law and Human Behavior , 20 (5), 533–554.
340 Parton, S. R., Siltanen, S. A., Hosman, L. A., & Langenderfer, J. (2002). Employment interview outcomes
and speech style effects. Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 21 (2), 144–161.
341 Sparks, J. R., Areni, C. S., & Cox, K. C. (1998). An investigation of the effects of language style and com-
munication modality on persuasion. Communication Monographs , 65 (2), 108–125.
342 Price, P. C., & Stone, E. R. (2004). Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: Evidence for a
confidence heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 17 (1), 39–57.
See n128, Yates et al. (1996).
343 Jules, S. J., & McQuiston, D. E. (2013). Speech style and occupational status affect assessments of eyewit-
ness testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 43 (4), 741–748.
344 Loyd, D. L., Phillips, K. W., Whitson, J., & Thomas-Hunt, M. C. (2010). Expertise in your midst: How
congruence between status and speech style affects reactions to unique knowledge. Group Processes &
Intergroup Relations , 13 (3), 379–395.
345 Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske &
G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 193–281). New York:
McGraw-Hill.