Person Perception in Audience Decision Making 307Schittekatte, M., & Van Hiel, A. (1996). Effects of partially shared information and awareness of unshared
information on information sampling. Small Group Research , 27 (3), 431–449.
388 Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an under-
standing of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,
77 (5), 967–978.
389 Kerschreiter, R., Schulz-Hardt, S., Faulmuller, N., Mojzisch, A., & Frey, D. (2004). Psychological explana-
tions for the dominance of shared and preference-consistent information in group discussions: Mutual enhancement or
rational-decision making? Working Paper, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
390 Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S., Kerschreiter, R., Brodbeck, F. C., & Frey, D. (2004). Social validation as an
explanation for the dominance of shared information in group decisions: A critical test and extension. Working
Paper, Dresden: University of Technology.
391 Larson, J. R., Sargis, E. G., Elstein, A. S., & Schwartz, A. (2002). Holding shared versus unshared infor-
mation: Its impact on perceived member influence in decision-making groups. Basic and Applied Social
Psychology , 24 (2), 145–155.