428 References
Read, D., Frederick, S., Orsel, B., & Rahman, J. (2005). Four score and seven years from now: The date/delay
effect in temporal discounting. Management Science, 51 (9), 1326–1335.
Read, S. J., Cesa, I. L., Jones, D. K., & Collins, N. L. (1990). When is the federal budget like a baby? Metaphor
in political rhetoric. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 5 (3), 125–149.
Reb, J., & Cropanzano, R. (2007). Evaluating dynamic performance: The infl uence of salient Gestalt charac-
teristics on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (2), 490–499.
Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fl uency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cogni-
tion: An International Journal, 8 (3), 338–342.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fl uency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the
perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 (4), 364–382.
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fl uency on affective judgments. Psy-
chological Science, 9 (1), 45–48.
Rebollar, R., Lidón, I., Martín, J., & Puebla, M. (2015). The identifi cation of viewing patterns of chocolate
snack packages using eye-tracking techniques. Food Quality and Preference, 39 , 251–258.
Redelmeier, D. A., & Shafi r, E. (1995). Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 273 , 302–305.
Redish, J. C. (1980). Readability. In D. Felker (Ed.), Document design: A review of the relevant research (pp. 69–93).
Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Redish, J. C. (1993). Understanding readers. In C. M. Barnum & S. Carliner (Eds.), Techniques for technical
communicators (pp. 14–41). New York: Macmillan.
Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal percep-
tion. Psychological Review, 86 (1), 61–79.
Reeves, B., Detenber, B., & Steuer, J. (1993, May). New televisions: The effects of big pictures and big sound on viewer
responses to the screen. Paper presented to the Information Systems Division of the International Commu-
nication Association, Chicago.
Rehe, R. F. (1974). Typography: How to make it legible. Carmel, IN: Design Research International.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 81 (2), 275–280.
Reid, J. C., Kardash, C. M., Robinson, R. D., & Scholes, R. (1994). Comprehension in patient literature:
The importance of text and reader characteristics. Health Communication Special Issue: Communicating With
Patients About Their Medications, 6 (4), 327–335.
Reilly, B. A., & Doherty, M. E. (1989). A note on the assessment of self-insight in judgment research. Organi-
zational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44 (1), 123–131.
Reingen, P. H., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Social perception and interpersonal infl uence: Some consequences
of the physical attractiveness stereotype in a personal selling setting. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2 (1),
25–38.
Reingold, E., & Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identifi cation stages identifi ed by the E-Z reader
model. Psychological Science, 17 (9), 742–746.
Reisberg, D., Mclean, J., & Goldfi eld, A. (1987). Easy to hear but hard to understand: A lip-reading advantage
with intact auditory stimuli. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading
(pp. 97–114). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Reisenzein, R. (2000). The subjective experience of surprise. In H. Bless & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message
within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 262–282). Philadelphia: Psychology
Press.
Rentsch, J. R., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Members of great teams think alike: A model of team effectiveness and
schema similarity among team members. In M. M. Beyerlein & D. A. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in inter-
disciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of self-managing work teams (Vol. 1, pp. 223–261). Greenwich, CT:
Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
Rentsch, J. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001). Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: Antecedents of team member
schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22 (2), 107–120.
Rentsch, J. R., Small, E. E., & Hanges, P. J. (2008). Cognitions in organizations and teams: What is the mean-
ing of cognitive similarity? In D. B. Smith (Ed.), The people make the place: Dynamic linkages between individu-
als and organizations. (pp. 127–155). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reyes, R. M., Thompson, W. C., & Bower, G. H. (1980). Judgmental biases resulting from differing avail-
abilities of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (1), 2–12.
Rhee, J. W., & Cappella, J. N. (1997). The role of political sophistication in learning from news: Measuring
schema development. Communication Research, 24 , 197–233.
Rhodes, G., Halberstadt, J., & Brajkovich, G. (2001). Generalization of mere exposure effects to averaged com-
posite faces. Social Cognition, 19 (1), 57–70.
Rholes, W. S., Jones, M., & Wade, C. (1988). Children’s understanding of personal dispositions and its relation-
ship to behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45 (1), 1–17.