References 449Wildgruber, D., Ethofer, T., Grandjean, D., & Kreifelts, B. (2009). A cerebral network model of speech prosody
comprehension. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11 (4), 277–281.
Will, K. E., Decina, L. E., Maple, E. L., & Perkins, A. M. (2015). Examining the relative effectiveness of differ-
ent message framing strategies for child passenger safety: Recommendations for increased comprehension
and compliance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 79 , 170–181.
Willer, R. (2004). The effects of government-issued terror warnings on presidential approval ratings. Current
Research in Social Psychology, 10 (1), 1–12.
Williams, J. M. (1990). Women’s preferences for and satisfaction with the convenience services offered by
a department store (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Woman’s University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts Interna-
tional, 51 (06B), 2848.
Williams, L. M., Brammer, M. J., Skerrett, D., Lagopolous, J., Rennie, C., Kozek, K.,... & Gordon, E. (2000).
The neural correlates of orienting: An integration of fMRI and skin conductance orienting. Neuroreport,
11 (13), 3011–3015.
Williams, T. R., & Spyridakis, J. H. (1992). Visual discriminability of headings in text. Professional Communica-
tion, IEEE Transactions on, 35 (2), 64–70.
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face.
Psychological Science, 17 (7), 592–598.
Wilson, M. G., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1989a). Information competition and vividness effects in
on-line judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44 (1), 132–139.
Wilson, R. A., & Keil, F. C. (Eds.). (1999). The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. Cambridge, MA: The
MIT Press.
Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted infl uences on
judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116 (1), 117–142.
Wilson, T. D., Kraft, D., & Dunn, D. S. (1989b). The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderat-
ing effect of knowledge about the attitude object. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25 (5), 379–400.
Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D. J., Schooler, J. W., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J., & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). Introspecting
about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 (3), 331–339.
Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of prefer-
ences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (2), 181–192.
Windschitl, P. D., & Weber, E. U. (1999). The interpretation of “likely” depends on the context, but “70%” is
70%—right?: The infl uence of associative processes on perceived certainty. Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25 (6), 1514–1533.
Wingenfeld, K., Mensebach, C., Driessen, M., Bullig, R., Hartje, W., & Beblo, T. (2006). Attention bias towards
personally relevant stimuli: The individual emotional Stroop task. Psychological Reports, 99 (3), 781–793.
Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy
versus angry faces infl uence consumption behavior and judgments of value. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 31 (1), 121–135.
Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence
that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (6), 989–1000.
Winkielman, P., & Fazendeiro, T. A. (2003). The role of conceptual fl uency in preference and memory. Unpublished
manuscript.
Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are
easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17 (9), 799–806.
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003a). The hedonic marking of processing fl uency:
Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affec-
tive processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Reber, R., & Fazendeiro, T. A. (2003b). Cognitive and affective consequences
of visual fl uency: When seeing is easy on the mind. In L. M. Scott & R. Batra (Eds.), Persuasive imagery: A
consumer response perspective (pp. 75–89). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Winn, A. R. (1984). A cognitive social information processing approach to leadership perceptions (Doctoral
dissertation, University of South Carolina, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46 (02A), 0464.
Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3 (3), 211–247.
Winquist, J. R., & Franz, T. M. (2008). Does the Stepladder Technique improve group decision making? A
series of failed replications. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12 (4), 255–267.
Winter, L., & Uleman, J. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of
trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (2), 237–252.
Winter, P. A. (1996). Applicant evaluations of formal position advertisements: The infl uence of sex, job mes-
sage content, and information order. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10 , 105–116.
Wish, M., D’Andrade, R. G., & Goodnow, J. E. (1980). Dimensions of interpersonal communication: Corre-
spondences between structures for speech acts and bipolar scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
39 (5), 848–860.