34 Understanding Rational Decision Making
Tanofsky, R., Shepps, R. R., & O’Neill, P. J. (1969). Pattern analysis of biographical predictors of success
as an insurance salesman. Journal of Applied Psychology , 53 (2, Pt. 1), 136–139.
55 See n 45, Kuperman (2000), p. 39.
56 Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2007). Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourc-
ing. Organization Science , 18 (4), 560–577.
57 Young, R. O. (1989). Cognitive processes in argumentation: An exploratory study of management consult-
ing expertise (Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International ,
50 (08B), 3764.
58 Nicholas, S. K. (1983, p. 89). A video observational study of the writing process of college students in a
non-academic situation (Doctoral dissertation, Oakland University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts Interna-
tional , 44 (03A), 684.
59 See n45, Kuperman (2000).
60 Carenini, G. (2001). Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments (Doctoral dissertation, University of
Pittsburgh, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International , 62 (05B), 2377.
61 See n33, Hall & Hofer (1993), p. 40.
62 Berger, Z. D., Yeh, J. C., Carter, H. B., & Pollack, C. E. (2014). Characteristics and experiences of patients
with localized prostate cancer who left an active surveillance program. The Patient-Patient-Centered Out-
comes Research , 7 (4), 427–436.
63 Solomon, J., Knapp, P., Raynor, D. K., & Atkin, K. (2013). Worlds apart? An exploration of prescrib-
ing and medicine-taking decisions by patients, GPs and local policy makers. Health Policy , 112 (3),
264–272.
64 Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976/1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
65 Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
66 Beach, L. R., Campbell, F. L., & Townes, B. O. (1979). Subjective expected utility and the prediction of
birth-planning decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 24 (1), 18–28.
Borcherding, K., & Rohrmann, B. (1990). An analysis of multiattribute utility models using field data.
In K. Borcherding, O. I. Larichev & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary issues in decision making (pp. 223–
241). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1973). Evaluation of complex stimuli using multi-attribute utility proce-
dures. Ann Arbor, MI: Technical Report, Engineering Psychology Laboratory, University of Michigan.
67 Stillwell, W. G., Barron, F. H., & Edwards, W. (1983). Evaluating credit applications: A validation of multiat-
tribute utility weight elicitation techniques. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance , 32 (1), 87–108.
68 See n60, Carenini (2001).
69 Carter, W. B., Beach, L. R., & Inui, T. S. (1986). The flu shot study: Using multiattribute utility theory
to design a vaccination intervention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 38 (3),
378–391.
70 Ericsson, K. A. (2001). Protocol analysis in psychology. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International
encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 12256–12262). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of thinking
during experts’ performance on representative tasks. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich & R.
Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 223–241). Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised edition). Cambridge,
MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
71 Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and
the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy , 98 , 1325–1348.
Schweitzer, M. (1994). Disentangling status quo and omission effects: An experimental analysis. Organi-
zational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 58 (3), 457–476.
Svenson, O. (2003). Values, affect, and processes in human decision making: A differentiation and consoli-
dation perspective. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), In emerging perspectives on judgment and decision
research (pp. 287–326). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72 Vlaev, I., Chater, N., & Stewart, N. (2007). Financial prospect relativity: Context effects in financial
decision-making under risk. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 20 (3), 273–304.
73 Lauer, T. W., & Peacock, E. (1992). Question-driven information search in auditor diagnosis. In T. W.
Lauer, E. Peacock & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Questions and information systems (pp. 253–271). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.