ATLAS OF THE UNIVERSE
Nebulae
W
hen Messier published his catalogue, in 1781, he
included nebulae of two types – those which looked
as though they were gaseous, and those which gave every
impression of being made up of stars. William Herschel
was among the first to recognize a definite difference
between the two classes, and in 1791 he said of the Orion
Nebula: ‘Our judgement, I venture to say, will be that the
nebulosity is not of a starry nature.’
Proof came in 1864, when Sir William Huggins, the
pioneer English astronomical spectroscopist, found that
the spectra of bright nebulae were of the emission type,
while the starry objects, such as M31 in Andromeda,
showed the familiar absorption lines. But there are also
two other classes of objects which have to be considered.
In particular M1, the first entry in Messier’s list, was
proved to be a supernova remnant – the wreck of the star
seen by the Chinese in 1054; its nickname of the Crab was
bestowed on it by the Earl of Rosse when he looked at it
with his great 183-centimetre (72-inch) telescope in the
mid-19th century. Another supernova remnant is the Gum
Nebula in Vela (Map 19), named after the Australian
astronomer Colin Gum; in this case the supernova blazed
forth in prehistoric times, and must have been exceptionally
brilliant back then.
Planetary nebulae have nothing to do with planets, and
are not true nebulae; they are old, highly evolved stars
which have thrown off their outer layers. The discarded
shells shine because of the ultra-violet radiation emitted by
the central star, which is extremely hot (with a surface
temperature which may reach 400,000 degrees C) and is
well on its way to becoming a white dwarf. All planetary
nebulae are expanding, and on the cosmic timescale the
planetary nebula stage is very brief. The best-known mem-
ber of the class is M57, the Ring Nebula in Lyra (Map 8),
which is easy to locate between the naked-eye stars
Beta and Gamma Lyrae; telescopically it looks like a
tiny, luminous cycle tyre, with a dim central star (although
very recent research suggests that it may really be in the
form of a double lobe rather than a ring). Other planetary
nebulae are less regular; M27, the Dumbbell Nebula in
Vulpecula (Map 8), earns its nickname, while the rather
faint M97, in Ursa Major (Map 1), is called the Owl
because the positions of two embedded stars do give a
slight impression of the eyes in an owl’s face.
True nebulae consist mainly of hydrogen, together
with what may be termed ‘dust’. They shine because of
stars in or very near them. Sometimes their light is due to
pure reflection, as with the nebulosity in the Pleiades, but
in other cases very hot stars make the nebulosity emit a
certain amount of luminosity on its own account, making
up what are termed HII regions. Such is the Great Nebula
M42, in Orion’s Sword (Map 16), where the illuminating
▲ M17, the Omega Nebula in
Sagittarius: John Fletcher,
25-cm (10-inch) reflector.
The Nebula is almost 6000
light-years away, but is
an easy telescopic object. It
has also been nicknamed the
Swan or Horseshoe Nebula.
M42, the Orion Nebula:
Commander H. R. Hatfield,
30-cm (12-inch) reflector.
Hen 1357,as imaged by
the Hubble Space Telescope.
It is about 18,000 light-years
away, and lies in Ara (it was
the 1357th object in a list
of unusual stars compiled
by Karl Henize). Previous
ground-based observations
indicate that over the past
few decades Hen 1357 has
changed from being an
ordinary hot star to an object
with the characteristics of a
planetary nebula. Only the
HST can show it in detail.
The image also shows a
companion star (at about 10
o’clock) within the nebula.
The Trapezium (Theta
Orionis) appears near the
centre of the picture, and
the bright and dark nebulosity
is well shown. Exposure,
10 minutes.
E152-191 UNIVERSE UK 2003mb 7/4/03 5:50 pm Page 188