A History of Modern Europe - From the Renaissance to the Present

1236 Ch. 30 • Global Challenges

A United States Empire?

The collapse of the Soviet empire left the United States as the world’s single
superpower. The U.S. maintains what constitutes an informal empire, influ­
enced by financial might and vast if over-extended armed forces, including
more than 700 military bases abroad. Conservative, or “Neo-Con,” expo­
nents of exerting forceful U.S. domination operate under the principle that
what seems good for the United States is good for the world. In the late
1990s, a more aggressive U.S. foreign policy increased fears in Europe about
U.S. foreign unilateralism and a rush to use force. On a continent ravaged by
two devastating world wars, this has not gone down well. The U.S. refused
in 2001 to sign the Kyoto Protocol, an agreement that requires countries to
reduce the harmful greenhouse gas emissions that have caused global
warming. In 2002, the U.S. government announced that it would not accept
the jurisdiction of a proposed new international court, which was being set
up to try those accused of crimes against humanity. Five years later, the
U.S. government announced its intention of placing a missile defense sys­
tem in Poland and the Czech Republic intended, in principle, to defend
against any attacks launched by Iran, which the U.S. accused of working to
build nuclear weapons. Such a plan outraged Russia, which fears the pres­
ence of such a system in neighboring states.

European Responses to U.S. Policy

In the wake of the attacks of September 11, 2001, the administration of

U.S. President George W. Bush turned its attention to Saddam Hussein

(1937-2006), Iraq’s dictator, arguing that he was continuing to produce and

hide “weapons of mass destruction” and that he had links to A1 Qaeda. Nei­

ther assertion was correct. While British Prime Minister Tony Blair (despite

popular opposition to the war) and a number of other states actively sup­

ported the U.S. position, Germany, France, and Russia opposed the Bush

administration’s position. In the meantime, UN weapons inspectors found

no “weapons of mass destruction.” Moreover, the Iraqis began to destroy

missiles whose range exceeded that permitted by the United Nations follow­

ing the Gulf War of 1991, when U.S. troops drove Iraqi forces from Kuwait,

which Saddam Hussein had invaded.

The United States and Britain launched an invasion of Iraq in March

2003, quickly defeating the Iraqi army. The United States set up military

authority in Iraq, along with a British zone in the south, anticipating that it

would eventually give way to some sort of democratic Iraqi government

(assuming religious, ethnic, and other tensions could be overcome). How­

ever, no weapons of mass destruction were ever found. This left the impres­

sion in much of Europe that some of the U.S. and British intelligence

documents used to reach the conclusion that the regime of Saddam Hus­

sein posed an immediate threat to the region or to U.S. interests—thus