Revolutionary Mobilization 621
Rhineland. Transport workers who had been put out of work attacked rail
roads and steamships on the Rhine River, forcing temporary government
concessions.
As in Paris, clubs and workers’ associations began meeting in several Ger
man cities in March. A Club of Democratic Women and a congress of work
ers both demanded equal rights for women. The German political theorist
and revolutionary Karl Marx hurried back to the Rhineland from Belgium,
convinced that the revolution he awaited was at hand.
Disturbances broke out in the German countryside. In the Black Forest,
peasants attacked noble manors. In early March, the rural poor defied laws
forbidding them to use royal and noble forests, and now hunted game and
pastured their flocks as they pleased. Some peasants seized and destroyed
old documents that had recorded feudal obligations and forced lords to sign
formal renunciations of old privileges. Outbreaks of violence occurred even
in Brandenburg, where the iron will of the Prussian nobles, the Junkers, had
rarely been tested. Several wary German princes formally relinquished long
held rights. Armies, militias, and police hesitated to enforce the laws or
obligations that affected the peasantry for fear of sparking a bloody uprising
like the one that took place in Polish Galicia in 1846.
Revolution in Central Europe
There weie relatively few liberals to trouble the sleep of the feeble-minded
Habsburg ruler, Ferdinand I (ruled 1835—1848), who could barely sign his
name to the reactionary decrees put before him. Liberals, most of whom
were Austrians seeking political change or Czechs desiring more rights for
their people, opposed Habsburg autocracy, not Habsburg rule itself. They
wanted constitutional reform, the complete emancipation of the peasantry,
greater efficiency in the administration of Habsburg lands, and, like West
ern liberals, freedom of the press and expansion of the electoral franchise.
Although Hungary, over which Ferdinand ruled as king, had an even
smaller middle class than Austria, it did have several prominent Hungarian
nobles who espoused liberalism and supported constitutional reform. Their
chief goal, however, was the creation of an independent Hungary. Lajos
Kossuth (1802-1894), a lawyer from a lesser noble family, emerged as the
leader of Hungarian liberals who had been influenced by British and Amer
ican constitutional liberalism. Whereas some Magyar leaders believed that
Hungary could survive as a nation only within the Austrian monarchy, Kos
suth saw Hungary’s junior partnership with Austria as an obstacle to liberal
reform and to Magyar nationalism. Most nobles were unwilling, however,
to support reforms that would inevitably undercut their special privileges.
Elsewhere in the Austrian monarchy, small nationalist groups, such as the
Polish Democratic Society, Young Italy, and the Italian Carbonari, also
demanded national independence from Habsburg rule.