The original    statement,  “If p,  then    q,” is  a   general form    that    covers  such
statements  as  the following:
Of  the three   Roman   numeral options in  Example 4,  only    one necessarily
follows.    Take    a   look    at  the options one at  a   time:
Can you see that    none    of  these   statements—not  even    number  3—necessarily
follows from    the original?
(C) I   and II  only
(D) I   and III only
(E) I,  II, and IIIIf  you live    in  Alabama,    then    you live    in  the United  States  (p  =   “live   in
Alabama”; q =   “live   in  U.S.”).1.
2. All  prime   numbers are integers    (p  =   “is prime”; q   =   “is an  integer”).
If  Marla   studies,    she will    get an  A   on  the test    (p  =   “studies”;  q   =   “gets   an
A”).3.
If  q,  then    p.  This    is  not necessarily so. You cannot  simply  switch  the p   and
the q.  Look    what    illogical   results you would   get with    the three   samples
above:I.
1. If   you live    in  the United  States, then    you live    in  Alabama.
2. All  integers    are prime   numbers.
3. If   Marla   gets    an  A   on  the test,   then    she must    have    studied.If  not p,  then    not q.  This    is  not necessarily so. You cannot  simply  negate
both    the p   and the q.  Look    what    illogical   results you would   get with    the
three   samples above: