1997), 431–49; D. J. B. Shaw,“Southern Frontiers in Muscovy, 1550–1700,”in James
H. Bater and R. A. French,Studies in Russian Historical Geography, 2 vols. (London:
Academic Press, 1983), 1: 117–42; B. N. Mironov and Ben Eklof,The Social History of
Imperial Russia, 1700– 1917 (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000).
On corporal punishment, see Abby M. Schrader,Languages of the Lash: Corporal Punish-
ment and Identity in Imperial Russia(DeKalb, Ill: Northern Illinois University Press,
2002). On branding exiles, see myCrime and Punishment.
On mapping, see L. A. Goldenberg,“Russian Cartography to ca. 1700,”in J. B. Harley and
David Woodward, eds.,The History of Cartography, 3 vols. in 6 pts. (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1987–2007, 1852–1903); Alexei Postnikov,Russia in Maps: A History
of the Geographical Study and Cartography of the Country(Moscow: Nash Dom—L’Age
d’Homme, 1996); and Kivelson,Cartographies of Tsardom.Classics are Leo Bagrow,A
History of Russian Cartography up to 1800, ed. Henry W. Castner (Wolfe Island, Ontario:
The Walder Press, 1975) and hisA History of the Cartography of Russia up to 1600, ed.
Henry W. Castner (Wolfe Island, Ont.: The Walder Press, 1975). More specifically, see
Peter C. Perdue,“Boundaries, Maps and Movement: Chinese, Russian, and Mongolian
Empires in Early Modern Central Eurasia,”The International History Review 20 (1998):
253 – 86; Steven Seegel,Mapping Europe’s Borderlands: Russian Cartography in the Age of
Empire(Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012) and Marina Tolmacheva,“The
Early Russian Exploration and Mapping of the Chinese Frontier,”Cahiers du monde russe
41 (2000): 41–56. Willard Sunderland explores concepts of territoriality:“Imperial
Space: Territorial Thought and Practice in the Eighteenth Century,”in Jane Burbank,
Mark Von Hagen, and A. V. Remnev, eds.,Russian Empire: Space, People, Power,
1700 – 1930 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007), 33–66; Gregory Afinogenov,
“The Eye of the Tsar: Intelligence-Gathering and Geopolitics in Eighteenth-Century
Eurasia,”Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 2015.
A classic statement on surveillance by early modern European states is Anthony Giddens,
The Nation-State and Violence: Volume Two of A Contemporary Critique of Historical
Materialism(Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1987). A classic on
identity in early modern France: Natalie Zemon Davis,The Return of Martin Guerre
(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983).
On the Muscovite bureaucracy: Peter B. Brown, “Bureaucratic Administration in
Seventeenth-Century Russia,”in Jarmo Kotilaine and Marshall Poe, eds.,Modernizing
Muscovy: Reform and Social Change in Seventeenth-Century Muscovy(London and New
York: Routledge, 2004), 57–78,“How Muscovy Governed: Seventeenth-Century Rus-
sian Central Administration,”Russian History36 (2009), 4: 459–529 and his“Muscovite
Government Bureaus,”Russian History10 (1983): 269–330. A classic article is Borivoj
Plavsic,“Seventeenth-Century Chanceries and their Staffs,”in Walter M. Pintner and
Don Karl Rowney, eds.,Russian Officialdom: The Bureaucratization of Russian Society from
the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century(Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina
Press, 1980), 19–45. On a community refusing their governor and the marketplace of
bribery, see Brian L. Davies,“The Politics of Give and Take:Kormlenieas Service
Remuneration and Generalized Exchange, 1488–1726,”in Kleimola and Lenhoff, eds.,
Culture and Identity,39–67 and hisState Power and Community in Early Modern Russia:
The Case of Kozlov, 1635– 1649 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004). On dissemin-
ating the law before printing, see Simon Franklin,“Printing and Social Control in Russia
2: Decrees,”Russian History38 (2011): 467–92 and his“Mapping the Graphosphere:
Cultures of Writing in Early 19th-Century Russia (and Before),”Kritika: Explorations in
Russian and Eurasian History12 (2011): 531–60.
The State Wields its Power 185