Opera

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

  1. Phillips, Harvey E. The Carmen Chronicle: The Making of an Opera.New
    York: Stein & Day, 1973. 288p. ISBN 0-8128-1609-9. ML410 .B62 P65.
    Describes the planning of the Metropolitan production of 1972 by Goeran
    Gentele, who was killed before it could take place. Unfortunately, the book is
    in a chatty style, with invented conversations.

  2. Furman, Nelly. “The Languages of Love in Carmen.” In Reading Opera
    (#218), 168–183.
    The usual reading of the story centers on the victimization of Don José and his
    justified murder of the villainous Carmen. Furman reads it another way, as
    Carmen’s story and her “struggle for freedom.” For José love is “narcissistic
    eroticism,” but for Carmen it is a bird in flight: it just happens. She loves love
    itself and its freedom.

  3. Dean, Winton. “The True Carmen?” Musical Times106 (1965): 846–855.
    Reprinted in GL, v.12.
    Criticizes Carmen: Kritische Neuausgabe nach den Quellen,by Fritz Oeser,
    published by Bärenreiter. Oeser examines the sources, as well as Bizet’s revi-
    sions (rejecting some). Dean finds the editor has made dubious changes and
    “has slighted Bizet’s genius.”

  4. Huebner, Steven. “Carmenas corrida de toros.” Journal of Musicological
    Research13 (1993): 3–29.
    Carmenis “about male madness, and the transformation of José into an ani-
    mal—in stark contrast to Escamillo, the other leading male and a ‘true-life’
    matador.” Carmen is also a matador, “without a sword”—she is impaled, and
    Escamillo is victorious. These ideas are realized in the music, which is subtly
    analyzed with micro- and macrotechniques. Most of the Carmenliterature is
    cited in 35 footnotes.

  5. Wright, Lesley A. “A New Source for Carmen.” 19thCM2-1 (July 1978): 61–


  6. Examines the so-called censor’s libretto; discusses variant readings and
    sources. A new “revision chronology” is proposed, in contrast to that in Fritz
    Oeser’s edition (see #583). Useful references to earlier work.



  7. Leicester, H. Marshall. “Discourse and the Film Text: Four Readings of Car-
    men.” COJ6-3 (November 1994): 245–282.
    Compares four motion picture versions of 1982–1983, by the directors Jean-
    Luc Godard, Carlos Saura, Peter Brook, and Francesco Rosi. Concentrates on
    the use of Bizet’s music in the films, rather than on the Carmen story. Godard
    scarcely uses the music at all; Saura uses record playing to bring in the music;
    Brook actually presents the opera, but reduced and reconstituted. Rosi’s ver-
    sion is a faithful rendition of the opera as staged.


See also McClary (#391).


128 Opera


http://www.ebook3000.com

Free download pdf