Figure  3.8 Studio  of  Francis Harwood:    Bust    of  a   Man,    black   limestone   on  a   yellow  marble  socle,
overall:    71.1    x   50.8    x   26.7    cm; base    or  socle:  21.6    cm, c.1758. Yale    Center  for British Art,    Paul    Mellon
Collection.
Source: Yale    Center  for British Art,    Paul    Mellon  Collection, USA /   Bridgeman   Images.Western paintings   featuring   black   servants    were,   as  in  the preceding   century,    very    common. It  was
fashionable for those   living  in  affluent    households  to  participate in  the fashion for the possession  and
display of  black   servants    that    waned   only    from    the 1770s,  when    antislavery debates became  more
prominent   and overt   displays    of  wealth  became  regarded    as  vulgar  ostentation (Bindman    and Weston,
2011,   146–148).   Most    blacks  outside Africa  were    either  slaves  or  descended   from    slaves. Black   servants
and pages   featured    extensively in  grand   manner  portraits,  conversation    pieces  and genre   scenes, and were
often   used    to  suggest colonial    landownership   (Retford,   Perry   and Vibert, 2013,   24).    An  iron    or  silver
slave   collar  (sometimes  inscribed   with    their   owner’s name    or  coat    of  arms)   or  earring often   signified
their   servitude.  They    were    represented in  many    forms   of  domestic    service,    taking  part    in  court   pageants    or
in  musical performances.   Highly  fashionable at  the French  court,  black   servants    were    sought  increasingly
by  other   courts  such    as  those   in  Prussia and Saxony. English court   portraits   often   included    a   black   servant
as  a   means   of  signifying  an  adherence   to  continental fashions.   The social  prestige    gained  through
ownership   of  a   black   servant was further enhanced    by  the European    fashion of  giving  them,   like    white
servants,   names   drawn   from    European    literature, history or  mythology,  a   striking    demonstration   of  their
appropriation   by  white   culture.    Black   servants    were    rarely  named   in  portrait    titles.
The fashion for keeping and representing    black   servants    reached its peak    in  France  during  the Regency of
1715–1723.  A   French  edict   of  1716    allowed aristocrats and wealthy financiers  to  bring   slaves  back    from
the colonies.   The intention   was that    they    should  eventually  be  returned    but many    stayed  on  as  servants
(Bindman,   Boucher and Weston, 2011b,  90–91). The practice    of  keeping black   servants    spread  down    the
social  scale,  from    court   to  private mansions.   As  the century progressed  black   servants    were    generally
represented in  art in  less    ceremonial, more    integrated  household   roles   or  informal    social  gatherings, those
serving male    masters often   carrying    out the role    of  groom   or  gentleman’s page.   Such    roles   offered some
hope    of  a   reasonable  education   or, in  rare    cases,  social  advancement,    especially  when    servants    had
converted   to  Christianity    (Bindman,   Kaplan  and Weston, 2011,   202–203).   In  England,    however,    the
resurgence  in  aristocratic    pride   and values  represented by  the vogue   for Reynolds’   grand   portraits   led to
the representation  of  more    subservient roles.  Blacks  serving women   members of  a   family  were    often
represented,    alongside   dogs,   parrots and monkeys,    as  accessories,    playthings  or  pets    (Dabydeen,  1985,
28–30). They    could   signify their   owners’ wealth  or  serve   as  foils   to  their   owners’ whiteskinned    beauty.
In  diplomatic  portraiture,    as  in  a   1780    portrait    of  George  Washington  by  John    Trumbull    (1756–1843),    a
black   servant might   signify his owner’s ancient rank    and chivalry    at  a   time    when    America was seeking
allies  in  established European    nations (Bindman    and Weston, 2011,   125–144).
The roles   played  by  black   servants    in  aristocratic    visual  compositions    and narratives  were    generally
marginal,   at  times   solitary,   and always  subordinate to  those   of  white   figures.    In  Watteau’s   fêtes   galantes
black   servants    at  times   interact    with    and at  other   times   stand   apart   from    their   white   companions, serving
as  proxy   viewers of  their   moods   and activities. Some,   overlooked  by  their   white   companions, appear  to
serve   as  witnesses   to  scenes  of  sexual  intrigue    or  flirtation  (Bindman,   Boucher and Weston, 2011b,  91–
99).    Their   other   roles   included    those   of  messengers, for example.    in  courtship   scenes; luxury  possessions;
fashion statements; or  children    of  nature  looking in  adoration   at  their   “superiors,”    who were    intended    to
represent,  by  these   means,  social  and cultural    authority.  Black   servants    were    usually placed  on  the left
hand    side    of  a   painting,   traditionally   the “dark”  or  “sinister”  (from   the Latin   for “left”) side.   Some,
especially  when    wearing turbans or  (incongruously) Turkish dress,  evoked  sexual  license (Bindman    and
