Friedmann–Lemaitre Cosmologies 87
of light, but freely propagating light did not exist at times when푧≳1080, so푧is then
no longer a true observable. Secondly, it is possible to describe the future in terms of
푎>1, but redshift is then not meaningful.
The value of the proportionality factor푤in Equations (5.28) and (5.29) follows
from the adiabaticity condition. Leaving the derivation of푤for a later discussion, we
shall anticipate here its value in three special cases of great importance.
Case I. Amatter-dominateduniverse filled with nonrelativistic cold matter in the
form of pressureless nonradiating dust for which푝=0. From Equation 5.28
then, this corresponds to푤=0, and the density evolves according to
휌m(푎)∝푎−^3 =( 1 +푧)^3. (5.30)
It follows that the evolution of the density parameter훺mis
훺m(푎)=훺m
퐻 02
퐻^2
푎−^3.
Solving for퐻^2 푎^2 훺and inserting it into Equation (5.13), one finds the evo-
lution of the Hubble parameter:
퐻(푎)=퐻 0 푎−^1
√
1 −훺m+훺m푎−^1 =퐻 0 ( 1 +푧)
√
1 +훺m푧. (5.31)
Case II. Aradiation-dominateduniverse filled with an ultra-relativistic hot gas com-
posed of elastically scattering particles of energy density 휀. Statistical
mechanics then tells us that the equation of state is
푝r=
1
3
휀=^1
3
휌r푐^2. (5.32)
This evidently corresponds to푤=^13 , so that the radiation density evolves
according to
휌r(푎)∝푎−^4 =( 1 +푧)^4. (5.33)
Case III. Thevacuum-energystate corresponds to a flat, static universe (푎̈=0,푎̇=
0) without dust or radiation, but with a cosmological term. From Equa-
tions (5.17) and (5.18) we then obtain
푝휆=−휌휆푐^2 ,푤=− 1. (5.34)
Thus the pressure of the vacuum energy is negative, in agreement with
the definition in Equation (5.19) of the vacuum-energy density as a nega-
tive quantity. In the equation of state [Equation (5.28)],휌휆and푝휆are then
scale-independent constants.
Early Time Dependence. It follows from the above scale dependences that the
curvature term in Equation (5.17) obeys the following inequality in the limit of
small푎:
푘푐^2
푎^2