Ardipithecus 149
Anthropologists of Note
Louis S. B. Leakey
Few figures in the history of
paleoanthropology discovered
so many key fossils, received
so much public acclaim, or
stirred up as much contro-
versy as Louis Leakey and his
second wife, Mary Leakey.
Born in Kenya of mission-
ary parents, Louis received
his early education from an
English governess and subse-
quently was sent to England
for a university education.
He returned to Kenya in the
1920s to begin his career
there.
It was in 1931 that Louis
and his research assistant
from England, Mary Nicol
(whom he married in 1936),
began working in their spare
time at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania,
searching patiently and persistently for
remains of early human ancestors. It
seemed a good place to look, for there
were numerous animal fossils as well as
crude stone tools lying scattered on the
ground and eroding out of the walls of
the gorge.
Their patience and persistence
were not rewarded until 1959, when
Mary found the first fossil. A year later,
another skull was found, and Olduvai
was on its way to being recognized as
one of the most important sources of
fossils relevant to human evolution in
all of Africa. While Louis reconstructed,
described, and interpreted the fossil
material, Mary made the definitive study
of the Oldowan tools, a very early stone
tool industry.
The Leakeys’ important discoveries
were not limited to those at Olduvai. In
the early 1930s, they found the first
fossils of Miocene apes in Africa at
Rusinga Island in Lake Victoria. Also
in the 1930s, Louis found a number
of skulls at Kanjera, Kenya, that show
a mixture of derived and more ances-
tral features. In 1948, at Fort Ternan,
Kenya, the Leakeys found the remains
of a late Miocene ape with features that
seemed appropriate for an ancestor
of the bipeds. After Louis’s
death, Paul Abell, a member
of an expedition led by Mary
Leakey, found the first fossil-
ized footprints of early bipeds
at Laetoli, Tanzania.
In addition to their own
work, Louis Leakey promoted
a good deal of important
work on the part of oth-
ers. He made it possible
for Jane Goodall to begin
her landmark field studies
of chimpanzees; later he
was instrumental in setting
up similar studies among
gorillas (by Dian Fossey)
and orangutans (by Biruté
Galdikas). He set into mo-
tion the fellowship program
responsible for the training
of numerous paleoanthropologists from
Africa. The Leakey tradition has been
continued by son Richard, his wife
Meave, and their daughter Louise.
Louis Leakey had a flamboyant
personality and a way of interpreting
fossil materials that frequently did not
stand up well to careful scrutiny, but
this did not stop him from publicly
presenting his views as if they were
the gospel truth. It was this aspect
of the Leakeys’ work that generated
controversy. Nonetheless, the Leakeys
produced a great deal of work that re-
sulted in a much fuller understanding
of human origins.
© Melville Bell Grosvenor/National Geographic Collection
River accompanied by fossils of forest animals. The name
Ardipithecus ramidus is fitting for an ultimate human
ancestor as Ardi means “floor” and ramid means “root” in
the local Afar language.
Now that the spectacular Ardi specimen has been suffi-
ciently analyzed by the team who discovered her, paleoan-
thropologists are debating her exact place on the human
line. Because the other African apes share a body plan sim-
ilar to one another, many paleoanthropologists expected
the earliest bipeds to resemble something halfway between
chimps and humans. Instead, Ardi shows that these forest
creatures moved in a combination of ways: They moved
across the tops of branches with the palms of their hands
and feet facing downward, and they walked between the
trees on the ground in an upright position. The other
African apes, as we saw in previous chapters, knuckle-walk
on the forest floor and hang suspended below the branches.
In other words, Ardi resembles some of the early Miocene
apes more than she does the living African apes.
This calls into question what the last common ances-
tor of humans and the other African apes looked like.
Does Ardi represent the more ancestral form, with the
other apes evolving independently after they split from
the human line but still converging to the typical African
ape body plan? Or does Ardi represent a new body plan,
characteristic of the earliest bipeds that evolved away from
the African ape plan shared by chimps and gorillas? And
what of Ardi’s relationship to the later bipeds? Until fall
Ardipithecus ramidus One of the earliest bipeds that lived in
forested portions of eastern Africa about 4.4 million years ago.