Evolution And History

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

248 CHAPTER 10 | The Neolithic Revolution: The Domestication of Plants and Animals


The Neolithic and


Human Biology


Although we tend to think of the invention of food pro-
duction in terms of its cultural impact, it obviously had
a biological impact as well. From studies of human skele-
tons from Neolithic burials, physical anthropologists have
found evidence for somewhat less mechanical stress on
peoples’ bodies and teeth. Although there are exceptions,
the teeth of Neolithic peoples show less wear, their bones
are less robust, and osteoarthritis (the result of stressed
joint surfaces) is not as marked as in the skeletons of Pa-
leolithic and Mesolithic peoples.
Though Neolithic teeth show less wear, recent discov-
eries from Pakistan provide the earliest evidence of human
dentistry: tiny holes made in the molar teeth of ancient
live humans, with fine flint drills.^24 Whether dentistry ac-
companied an increase in dental decay brought about by
the dietary shift of this period remains to be seen. This
would parallel the clear evidence for a marked overall de-
terioration in health and mortality during the Neolithic.
Anthropologist Anna Roosevelt sums up our knowledge
of this in the following Original Study.

not used by early Neolithic people in the Americas. In-
stead, elaborate pottery was manufactured by hand.
Looms and the hand spindle appeared in the Americas
about 3,000 years ago.
None of these absences indicate any backwardness on
the part of Native American peoples, many of whom, as
we have already seen, were highly sophisticated farmers
and plant breeders. Rather, the effectiveness of existing
practices was such that they continued to be satisfactory.
When food production developed in Mesoamerica and
the Andean highlands, it did so wholly independently
of Europe and Asia, with different crops, animals, and
technologies.
Outside Mesoamerica and the Andean highlands,
hunting, fishing, and the gathering of wild plant foods
remained important elements in the economy of Neo-
lithic peoples in the Americas. Apparently, most
American Indians chose not to entirely switch from a
food-foraging to a food-producing mode of life, even
though maize and other domestic crops came to be cul-
tivated just about everywhere that climate permitted.
The Indian lifeways were so effective, so well integrated
into a complete cultural system, and so environmen-
tally stable that for many of these groups the change to
food production was unnecessary. The stable American
Indian cultures were only disrupted by the arrival of
European explorers who brought disease and devasta-
tion with them.


(^24) Coppa, A., et al. (2006). Early Neolithic tradition of dentistry. Nature 440,
755–756.
Original Study


History of Mortality and Physiological Stress by Anna Roosevelt


Although there is a relative
lack of evidence for the Pa-
leolithic stage, enough skel-
etons have been studied that
it seems clear that seasonal
and periodic physiological
stress regularly affected most
pre historic hunting-gathering
populations, as evidenced
by the presence of enamel
hypoplasias [horizontal linear
defects in tooth enamel] and
Harris lines [horizontal lines
near the ends of long bones].
What also seems clear is
that severe and chronic stress,
with high frequency of hypoplasias,
infectious disease lesions, pathologies
related to iron-deficiency anemia, and
high mortality rates, is not characteristic
of these early populations. There is no
evidence of frequent, severe malnutri-
tion, and so the diet must have been

adequate in calories and other nutrients
most of the time.
During the Mesolithic, the pro-
portion of starch in the diet rose, to
judge from the increased occurrence
of certain dental diseases, but not
enough to create an impoverished

diet. At this time, diets
seem to have been made up
of a rather large number of
foods, so that the failure of
one food source would not
be catastrophic. There is
a possible slight tendency
for Paleolithic people to be
healthier and taller than
Mesolithic people, but there
is no apparent trend toward
increasing physiological
stress during the Mesolithic.
Thus, it seems that both
hunter-gatherers and incipi-
ent agriculturalists regularly
underwent population pressure, but
only to a moderate degree.
During the periods when effec-
tive agriculture first comes into use,
there seems to be a temporary upturn
in health and survival rates in a few
regions: Europe, North America, and

Harris lines near the ends of these youthful thigh bones, found
in a prehistoric farming community in Arizona, are indicative of
recovery after growth arrest, caused by famine or disease.

© Alan H. Goodman, Hampshire College
Free download pdf