288 CHAPTER 12 | Modern Human Diversity: Race and Racism
ranking human beings with respect to their intelligence
scores in terms of “racial” difference is doubly false.
Over the past 2.5 million years, all populations of the
genus Homo have adapted primarily through culture—
actively inventing solutions to the problems of survival,
rather than relying only on biological adaptation. Thus
we would expect a comparable degree of intelligence in all
present-day human populations. The only way for indi-
vidual human beings to develop their innate abilities and
skills to the fullest is to ensure that they have access to the
necessary resources and the opportunity to do so.
Studying Human
Biological Diversity
Although the biological category of race is not valid
when considering groups of humans, this is not to say
that differences in various biological traits such as skin
color do not exist. In fact, skin color provides an excel-
lent example of the role of natural selection in shaping
human variation.
The physical characteristics of both populations and
individuals are a product of the interaction between
genes and environments. For example, genes predispose
people to a particular skin color, but an individual’s skin
color is also influenced by cultural and environmental
factors. The skin of sailors, for example, is darkened or
burned after many hours of exposure to the sun, de-
pending on not only genetic predisposition but cultural
practices regarding exposure to the sun. In other cases,
such as A-B-O blood type, phenotypic expression closely
reflects genotype.
For characteristics controlled by a single gene, differ-
ent versions of that gene, known as alleles (see Chapter 2),
also mediate variation. Such traits are called polymorphic
(meaning “many shapes”). Our blood types—determined
by the alleles for types A, B, and O blood—are an example
of a polymorphism and may appear in any of four distinct
pheno typic forms (A, B, O, and AB).
A species can also be considered polymorphic, mean-
ing that there is wide variation among individuals (beyond
differences between males and females). Here “polymor-
phic” refers to continuous phenotypic variation that may
be genetically controlled by interactions among multiple
different genes, in addition to the allelic variation de-
scribed above. When a polymorphic species faces chang-
ing environmental conditions, the variation it has within
its gene pool fosters survival of the species, since some of
those individuals may possess traits that prove adaptive in
the altered environment. Individuals whose physical char-
acteristics enable them to do well in the new environment
will usually reproduce more successfully, so that their
It is also well known that IQ scores rise in proportion to
the test-takers’ amount of schooling.
More such cases could be cited, but these three obser-
vations suffice to make the point. First, there is a bias in IQ
testing based on social class. Second, the assertion that IQ
is biologically fixed and immutable is clearly false. Third,
Differences in the growth process can lead to very different outcomes
in terms of size as seen in these twins, who are genetically identical.
Even starting from inside their mother’s womb, twins may experience
environmental differences in terms of blood and nutrient supply. This
can impact not only size but cognitive development.
From Komai, T., & Fukuoka, G. (1934, October). Post-natal growth disparity in monozygotic twins.
Journal of Heredity
25
, 423–430.
polymorphic Describing species with alternative forms
(alleles) of particular genes.