References 409Brodsky, S. (1973). Psychologists in the criminal justice system.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
Buckhout, R. (1974). Eyewitness testimony. Scientific American,
231,23–31.
Burtt, H. E. (1931). Legal psychology.Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-
Merrill.
Cahn, E. (1955). Jurisprudence. New York University Law Review,
30,150–169.
Cattell, J. M. (1895). Measurements of the accuracy of recollection.
Science, 2,761–766.
Ceci, S., & Hembrooke, H. (Eds.). (1998). Expert witnesses in
child abuse cases.Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
Ceci, S., Toglia, M., & Ross, D. (Eds.). (1987). Children’s eyewit-
ness memory.New York: Springer-Verlag.
Christie, R. (1976). Probability v. precedence: The social psychol-
ogy of jury selection. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar
(Eds.),Psychology and the law: Research frontiers(pp. 265–
281). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Clark, K. B. (1953). Desegregation: An appraisal of the evidence.
Journal of Social Issues, 9,1–15.
Clark, M. (1997). Without a doubt.New York: Viking Penguin.
Cleburne Living Center, Inc. v. City of Cleburne, Texas, 726 F.3d
191 (1985).
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists.
(1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and
Human Behavior, 15,655–665.
Cook, S. W. (1979). Social science and desegregation: Did we
mislead the Supreme Court? Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 15,420–437.
Cook, S. W. (1984). The 1954 Social Science Statement and school
desegregation: A reply to Gerard. American Psychologist, 39,
819–831.
Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The
eyewitness, psychology, and the law.Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S. Ct. 2786
(1993).
Davis v. United States, 165 U.S. 373 (1897).
Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (1954).
Elliott, R. (1991a). Social science data and the APA: The Lockhart
brief as a case in point. Law and Human Behavior, 15,59–76.
Elliott, R. (1991b). Response to Ellsworth. Law and Human Behav-
ior, 15,91–94.
Ellsworth, P. C. (1991). To tell what we know or wait for Godot.
Law and Human Behavior, 15,77–90.
Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 (1979).
Federal Rules of Evidence for the United States courts and magis-
trates.(1975). St. Paul, MN: West.
Finkel, N. J. (1988). Insanity on trial.New York: Plenum Press.
Freud, S. (1959). Psycho-analysis and the ascertaining of truth in
courts of law. In E. Jones (Ed.), Collected papers of Sigmund
Freud(Vol. 2, pp. 13–24). New York: Basic Books. (Original
work published 1906)
Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
Fulero, S. M. (1993). Eyewitness expert testimony: An overview and
annotated bibliography, 1931–1988.Unpublished manuscript,
Sinclair College, Dayton, Ohio.
Garrison, A. H. (1998). The history of the M’Naughten insanity de-
fense and the use of posttraumatic stress disorder as a basis of
insanity.American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16,39–88.
Gerard, H. B. (1983). School desegregation: The social science role.
American Psychologist, 38,869–877.
Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S. Ct. 1951 (1967).
Goodman, G. S., Levine, M., & Melton, G. B. (1992). The best evi-
dence produces the best law. Law and Human Behavior, 16,
244–251.
Goodman, G. S., Levine, M., Melton, G., & Ogden, D. W. (1991).
The American Psychological Association brief in Maryland v.
Craig. Law and Human Behavior, 15,13–29.
Greenburg, J. (1956). Social scientists take the stand: A review and
appraisal of their testimony in litigation. Michigan Law Review,
54,953–970.
Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments
and instruments.New York: Plenum Press.
Grisso, T. (1991). A developmental history of the American
Psychology-Law Society. Law and Human Behavior, 15,213–
231.
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. (1998). Assessing competence to con-
sent to treatment.New York: Oxford University Press.
Grisso, T., Cocozza, J., Steadman, H., Fisher, W., & Greer, A.
(1994). The organization of pretrial forensic evaluation ser-
vices: A national profile. Law and Human Behavior, 18,377–
393.
Grisso, T., Sales, B., & Bayless, S. (1982). Law-related graduate
courses and programs in psychology departments: A national
survey. American Psychologist, 37,267–278.
Grisso, T., & Schwartz, R. (Eds.). (2000). Youth on trial: A develop-
mental perspective on juvenile justice.Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Grove, W. M., & Barden, R. C. (1999). Protecting the integrity
of the legal system: The admissibility of testimony from men-
tal health experts under Daubert/Kumhoanalyses.Psychology,
Public Policy, and Law, 5,224–242.
Hafemeister, T. L., & Melton, G. B. (1987). The impact of social
science research on the judiciary. In G. B. Melton (Ed.), Reform-
ing the law: The impact of developmental research(pp. 27–59).
New York: Guilford Press.
Hare, R. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has
come.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23,25–54.