532 International Psychology
Evans, R. B., & Scott, F. J. D. (1978). The 13th International
Congress of Psychology: The American congress that wasn’t.
American Psychologist, 33,711–723.
Fleishman, E. A. (1979). The new applied psychology: An interna-
tional perspective. International Review of Applied Psychology,
28,67–74.
Fleishman, E. A. (1999). Applied psychology: An international
journey. American Psychologist, 54,1008–1016.
Fowler, R. D. (1996). Editorial. American Psychologist, 51,5–7.
Georgas, J. (1994). Psychology in Greece. In A. Schorr & S. Saari
(Eds.),Psychology in Europe(pp. 59–75). Bern, Switzerland:
Hogrefe and Huber.
Gergen, K. J., Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Misra, G. (1996). Psycho-
logical science in cultural context. American Psychologist, 51,
496–503.
Gielen, U. P., & Bredenkamp, J. (1997). Editorial. World Psychol-
ogy, 3,247–252.
Gilgen, A. R., & Gilgen, C. K. (Eds.). (1987). International hand-
book of psychology.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Graumann, C. F. (1997). Psychology in postwar Germany: The vi-
cissitudes of internationalization. World Psychology, 3,253–277.
Hanscom, K. L. (2001). Teaching survivors of war trauma and tor-
ture.American Psychologist, 56,1032–1039.
Henle, M. (1978). One man against the Nazis: Wolfgang Köhler.
American Psychologist, 33,939–944.
Hilgard, E. R., Leary, D. E., & McGuire, E. R. (1991). The history
of psychology: A survey and critical assessment. Annual Review
of Psychology, 42,79–107.
Jing, Q. (2000). International psychology. In K. Pawlik &
M. Rosenzweig (Eds.), The international handbook of psychol-
ogy(pp. 570–584).London: Sage.
Kapor-Stanulovic, N. (1999). Encounter with suffering. American
Psychologist, 54,1020–1027.
Kennedy, S., & David, H. P. (1986). Psychology and policy around
the world: Widening psychology’s sphere of influence. American
Psychologist, 41,296–297.
Klineberg, O. (1964). The human dimension of international rela-
tions.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Klineberg, O. (1967). The IUPsyS and international relations. Inter-
national Journal of Psychology, 2,76–78.
Koch, S. (1985). Foreword: Wundt’s creature at age zero and cente-
narian: Some aspects of the institutionalization of the “new
psychology.” In S. Koch & D. E. Leary (Eds.), A century of psy-
chology as science(pp. 7–35). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kossakowski, A. (1980). Psychology in the German Democratic
Republic.American Psychologist, 35,450–460.
Lomov, B. F. (1982). Soviet psychology: Its historical origins and
contemporary status. American Psychologist, 37,580–586.
Lunt, I., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1996). Internationalizing psychology:
The case of Europe. American Psychologist, 51,504–508.
Luria, A. R., & Majovski, L. V. (1977). Basic approaches used in
American and Soviet clinical neuropsychology. American Psy-
chologist, 32,959–968.
MacLeod, R. B. (1957). A note on the international congress. In
H. P. David & H. V. Bracken (Eds.), Perspectives in personality
theory(pp. 419–424). New York: Basic Books.
Mays, V. M., Rubin, J., Sabourin, M., & Walker, L. (1996). Moving
toward a global psychology. American Psychologist, 51,485–
487.
Mehryar, A. H. (1984). The role of psychology in international de-
velopment: Wishful thinking and reality. International Journal
of Psychology, 19,65–77.
Melikian, L. H. (1984). The transfer of psychological knowledge to
Third World countries and its impact on development: The case
of the Arab Gulf oil-producing states. International Journal of
Psychology, 19,65–77.
Merenda, P. F. (1995). International movements in psychology: The
major international associations of psychology. World Psychol-
ogy, 1,27–48.
Murphy, G., & Kovach, J. K. (1972). Historical introduction to
modern psychology.New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
Pawlik, K., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1996). Psychology and the global
commons.American Psychologist, 51,488–495.
Pawlik, K., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (Eds.). (1994). The origins and
development of psychology: Some national and regional per-
spectives [Special issue]. International Journal of Psychology,
29,665–756.
Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Cultural psychology: A U.S. tragedy. In
M. Givadan & T. Venguer (Eds.), Conferencias magistrales
congreso regional para profesionales en America(pp. 39–54).
Mexico City: IMIFAP.
Rosenzweig, M. R. (1979). Promoting international communica-
tion in psychology. International Journal of Psychology, 14,
285–286.
Rosenzweig, M. R. (1984). U.S. psychology and world psychology.
American Psychologist, 39,877–884.
Rosenzweig, M. R. (1988). Psychology and the United Nations
human rights efforts. American Psychologist, 43,79–86.
Rosenzweig, M. R. (1992). International psychological science.
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rosenzweig, M. R., Holtzman, W. H., Sabourin, M., & Bolanger, D.
(2000).The history of the International Union of Psychological
Science (IUPsyS).Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Russell, R. W. (1984). Psychology in its world context. American
Psychologist, 39,1017–1025.
Salazar, J. M. (1984). The use and impact of psychology in
Venezuela: Two examples. International Journal of Psychology,
19,179–182.
Schmidt, H. D. (1980). Psychology in the German Democratic
Republic.Annual Review of Psychology, 31,195–209.