The EconomistJune 29th 2019 Business 65
I
n 2000 chinahad two supercomputers
ranked among the world’s fastest 500.
Ten years later a machine named Tianhe-1a
topped the global league table. It was,
though, based on Intel chips. So when in
2015 America barred its giant chipmaker
from selling to four Chinese supercompu-
ter labs—fearing that the machines were
being used to simulate nuclear blasts—it
might have expected China’s progress in
the field to slow. Instead, China unveiled
another supercomputer, Sunway Taihu-
Light, that led that ranking in 2016 and
2017—this time powered entirely by home-
grown microprocessors. The latest Ameri-
can sanctions will nevertheless bite.
On June 21st America’s Commerce De-
partment blacklisted another five Chinese
supercomputing entities on the grounds
that they too pose a threat to national secu-
rity. The export ban prohibits American
firms from selling them chips and “inter-
connects” that allow chips to talk to each
other. An army-led institute that designed
chips for the latest world-beating machine
is on the list, as is Sugon, which has built a
third of China’s 100 fastest ones.
So is Hygon, born of a joint venture in
2016 between Sugon and Advanced Micro
Devices (amd), an American semiconduc-
tor firm. Intel chips dominate high-pow-
ered computing in desktops, servers and
supercomputers. But amdmakes advanced
ones compatible with Intel’s technology.
The $293m arrangement gave Hygon the
ability to make slightly slower near-repli-
cas of amd’s designs—and China a domes-
tic manufacturer of crucial components.
The latest ban chokes off practically all
of amd’s dealings with Hygon. Transfer of
intellectual property and technical support
are proscribed. The manufacturer of the
copycat chips, GlobalFoundries, is Ameri-
can, so it too is banned from working with
Hygon. Finding an alternative foundry
would require onerous tweaks to the chips’
design. amdhas carefully transferred only
as much knowledge as Hygon needs to
copy but not reverse-engineer them.
A blow, for sure—but perhaps not a
knockout. Last year new American com-
puters ended China’s dominance; it will be
pouring money into reclaiming it. Jack
Dongarra, a supercomputing expert at the
University of Tennessee who has scruti-
nised Sunway’s chip, calls it “very impres-
sive”. Rumours have spread of a big new su-
percomputer powered by amd’s licensed
chipswhirringina Chineselab.
ToChinatheblacklisting,daysbefore
PresidentDonaldTrumpistomeethisChi-
nesecounterpart,Xi Jinping,attheg 20
summitinJapan,smacksofa negotiating
ployinthetwocountries’tradewar.InMay
MrTrumpsaidhecouldeaseexportrestric-
tionsthathad beenplacedtheprevious
weekonHuawei,a Chinesetelecomsgiant.
Evenif hedoesn’t,IntelandMicron,anoth-
erchipmaker,arealreadycircumventing
theHuaweibaninwaystheyclaimarele-
gal,accordingtotheNewYorkTimes. FedEx
issuing America’sgovernment overthe
“impossible”jobofinspectingparcelsto
blacklistedChinesefirms.Chippingaway
atChinesecomputingprogressistough. 7
SHANGHAI
An American ban hits at the core of
China’s supercomputer industry
Chinese technology
The balance of
processing power
Notsofast
F
or a manwho apparently likes to keep a
low profile, Daniel Kretinsky makes a lot
of headlines. In March journalists of Le
Monde battled to prevent the inscrutable
Czech oligarch from taking control of the
prestigious French daily. On June 23rd the
management of Metro, a German retail be-
hemoth based in Düsseldorf, rejected a
€5.8bn ($6.6bn) takeover offer from ep Glo-
bal Commerce, an investment vehicle con-
trolled by Mr Kretinsky and Patrik Tkac, his
Slovak business partner, arguing that it
“substantially undervalues” the company.
The offer of €16 a share is a measly 3% above
the previous closing price on June 21st.
In a statementep Global Commerce said
it has the “full support” of the Haniel fam-
ily, an important shareholder, and that it
holds call options for 9% of Metro shares
owned by Ceconomy, a consumer-elec-
tronics business that used to be part of the
group. One of Germany’s oldest industrial
clans, the Haniels owned a big chunk of
Metro for more than half a century.
After years of poor returns, the Haniels
decided last August to cut their losses by
selling 7.3% of Metro to Messrs Kretinsky
and Tkac. They also gave the duo an option
to buy the family’s remaining 15.2% stake.
Metro has two other big shareholders: the
Meridian Stiftung, which owns 14.2% of
shares, and the Beisheim Holding, which
holds 6.6%. Meridian reportedly said it will
not sell; Beisheim has not yet announced
its decision.
What does the Francophile Mr Kretin-
sky, who made his money in the energy in-
dustry, want with a struggling German re-
tailer? According to Bruno Monteyne at ab
Bernstein, a research firm, he saw an op-
portunity to buy—on the cheap and with
outside finance—a retailer still in the pro-
cess of transformation. Metro was once a
retail conglomerate with activities stretch-
ing from consumer electronics to depart-
ment stores. Under Olaf Koch, its chief ex-
ecutive, it has been shedding businesses to
focus on food wholesalers. Mr Koch is not
done. He is about to sell Real, a loss-making
chain of hypermarkets, as well as Metro’s
China business. epGlobal Commerce says
it backs the decision to flog these business-
es provided Mr Koch can get a good price.
Messrs Kretinsky and Tkac have four
weeks to submit their offer to German reg-
ulators and Metro’s board. They can either
stick to their stingy bid or increase it in the
hope of winning over Meridian and other
shareholders. ep Global Commerce will
only buy the rest of the Haniel shares if this
gets it across a threshold of 75% of votes at
the annual meeting. This would trigger a
“domination agreement” that lets it exer-
cise full control of the group’s cashflow
without owning 100% of the company.
If they fail, Metro will have two large,
unhappy shareholders: the eastern Euro-
peans, with 7.3% plus options to buy Ceco-
nomy’s 9%, and the Haniels, with 15.2%. Mr
Koch may struggle to find a taker for their
stakes at a time when traditional retail is
threatened by e-commerce. Metro’s annual
sales of €36bn remain hefty. But they are in
decline, as are profits. A counter-bid could
come from farther east—an Asian buyer in-
terested in more than Metro’s Chinese arm.
If it does, Mr Kretinsky and Mr Tkac may
walk away with a profit. If it doesn’t, they
will own one of the world’s top ten retail-
ers.Eitherway,expectmoreheadlines. 7
BERLIN
A German retailer is fighting for its
independence
The battle for Metro
From Prague, with
cash
Correction:In “Flying start” ( June 15th) we said that
drones run by UPS are replacing some delivery cars
in North Carolina. In fact, the drones move medical
supplies at a hospital campus in addition to a
courier service that is not operated by UPS. Sorry.