PC Gamer Presents - PC Hardware Handbook - May 2018

(nigelxxx) #1
Our test bed consists of an Asus Z370 Maximus X Hero for the Core i7, and an Asus X299 Prime Deluxe motherboard for the Core
i9. All memory tests were performed with either 8GB or 16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DIMMs, with a CAS latency of 16.

8GB DDR4 Cinebench R15 Single/Multi
(Index)

AIDA 64
Memory
Read
(MB/s)

AIDA 64
Latency (ns)

Total War
Warhammer II
(Low and
Avg fps)

Middle Earth
Shadow of War
(Low and
Avg fps)

10GB WINRar
Archive Time
(Seconds)

Core i7-8700K @ 2,400MT/s 204/1,521 35,933 65 38/43 22/51 245

Core i7-8700K @ 2,666MT/s 205/1,522 39,418 53.1 39/43 28/53 232

Core i7-8700K @ 3,000MT/s 205/1,527 44,130 51.2 39/43 25/53 223

Core i7-8700K @ 3,200MT/s 204/1,526 46,802 47.3 31/43 34/51 215

16GB DDR4 Cinebench R15 Single/Multi
(Index)

AIDA 64
Memory
Read
(MB/s)

AIDA 64
Latency (ns)

Total War
Warhammer II
(Low and
Avg fps)

Middle Earth
Shadow of War
(Low and
Avg fps)

10GB WINRar
Archive Time
(Seconds)

Core i7-8700K @ 2,400MT/s 204/1,515 35,282 57.5 38/43 34/51 245

Core i7-8700K @ 2,666MT/s 205/1,532 38,936 53.4 33/43 24/51 231

Core i7-8700K @ 3,000MT/s 205/1,544 43,662 49.3 33/43 35/52 225

Core i7-8700K @ 3,200MT/s 204/1,541 46,153 47.1 38/43 24/52 216

32GB DDR4 Cinebench R15 Single/Multi
(Index)

AIDA 64
Memory
Read
(MB/s)

AIDA 64
Latency (ns)

Total War
Warhammer II
(Low and
Avg fps)

Middle Earth
Shadow of War
(Low and
Avg fps)

10GB WINRar
Archive Time
(Seconds)

Core i9-7900X @ 2,400MT/s 195/2,175 62,432 84.4 33/43 29/52 197

Core i9-7900X @ 2,666MT/s 194/2,167 70,065 77.3 36/42 32/51 192

Core i9-7900X @ 3,000MT/s 191/2,197 77,599 73.8 31/43 24/51 185

Core i9-7900X @ 3,200MT/s 194/2,177 83,063 70.3 34/43 26/52 182

BENCHMARKS


Memory Matters


FEATURE


HOW MEMORY SPEEDS AFFECT INTEL CHIPS
INTEL

When it comes to memory, over the years
Intel’s architecture has benefitted very little
from increased frequencies. Certainly, the
current mainstream platform sees little to no
performance increases when fixed up with
higher frequency memory with lower
latencies. When it comes to mainstream
applications, gaming, and even video editing to
some degree, if you’re sitting pretty on Z77 and
above, you’ll likely have enough bandwidth to
do anything you want, without having to shell
out for higher frequency kits for the additional
bandwidth. There is one area where Intel does
benefit from higher frequency memory,
though, and that’s file compression. If you’re
exporting and sending compressed files on a

day-to-day basis, memory speed does help
significantly. That said, it’s a fairly niche
scenario. All we can suggest, then, is that the
best thing to do when speccing out a new
system is to find a reasonable frequency (2,400
or 2,666MT/s) memory kit at a capacity that
suits your needs. We’ve recommended a few
kits as examples (see opposite), so pick a kit
with similar specs for as little money as you
can find. The good thing here is that unless
you desperately need the higher frequencies
you can shop around the different
manufacturers and you’re likely to find better
deals, because you’re mainly focusing on
capacity rather than worrying about whether a
particular brand works better with Intel CPUs.
Free download pdf