STACKED UP
PRICE (£) CINEBENCH R15 (POINTS)
Single
Multi
(Higher is better)ASHES OF SINGULARITY (FPS)
1440p/high
1080p/low
(Higher is better)7
75 %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3.53.63.63.53.73.64.0Base clock speed (GHz)ESSENTIALS
3.74.04.03.74.74.34.0Turbo clock speed (GHz)4864664Cores4161281264ThreadsGroup Test
PROCESSORS
76
However, as soon as Ryzen came along it instantly
looked like poor value, despite the high clock speed
meaning it held its own when gaming.
Intel’s response? The Core i7-8700K. With 50%
more cores it brings the fight to AMD’s finest in
multithreaded workloads while its 3.7GHz-4.7GHz
clock speed means it still has a big advantage.
What’s more, it overclocks well. With an Maximus X
Hero I managed to push all six cores to 5GHz.
This is all reflected in its benchmarks where it
tops the Cinebench single-thread test and almost
beats the 1800X in the multithread test. In games, it
dominates, topping all but one of the tests.
The only downside is that it’s still pricey
compared to AMD’s range. Even the eight-core
1800X is cheaper, and though the 8700K holds its
own in multithread workloads, it’s not that good.
However, with a strong lead in clock speed, the
8700K is still the clear choice for those
seeking pure gaming performance,
without too much regard for price.INTEL CORE i7-8700K
http://www.intel.com £355
The i7-7700K was the ideal for gamers who weren’t on a
budget. Its four hyperthreaded cores, 4.2GHz base
speed and 4.5Ghz turbo boost offered a perfect balance
of single and multithreaded performance.1 2 3 4 5 6 7AMD Ryzen 5 1500XAMD Ryzen 3 1300XAMD Ryzen 7 1800XAMD Ryzen 5 1600XIntel Core i5-8600KIntel Core i3-8350KIntel Core i7-8700K105
152 545
45.2 52155
155 812
45.8 67180
161 1240
45.2 64.6330
159 1619
42.9 68.1155
174 670
46.3 70.2240
188 1072
43.7 84.2355
207 1543
45.6 93.5