Sustainable Agriculture and Food: Four volume set (Earthscan Reference Collections)

(Elle) #1
Reality Cheques 49

Ewel K C. 1997. Water quality improvement in wetlands. In Daily G (ed). Nature’s Services: Societal
Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC
FAO. 1999. The Future of Our Land. FAO, Rome
FAO. 2000. Agriculture: Towards 2015/30. Global Perspective Studies Unit, FAO, Rome
FAO. 2001. Animal Agriculture in the EU. Some Elements for a Way Forward. Animal Production and
Health Division, FAO, Rome
Fleischer G and Waibel H. 1998. Externalities by Pesticide Use in Germany. Paper presented to Expert
Meeting: The Externalities of Agriculture: What do we Know? EEA, Copenhagen, May 1998
Flora J L. 1998. Social capital and communities of place. Rural Sociology 63(4), 481–506
Foster V, Bateman I J and Harley D. 1997. Real and hypothetical willingness to pay for environmental
preservation: A non-experimental comparison. Journal of Agricultural Economics 48(1), 123–
138
Funes F. 2001. Cuba and Sustainable Agriculture. Paper presented to St James’s Palace conference:
Reducing Poverty with Sustainable Agriculture, 15 January
Gren I M. 1995 Costs and benefits of restoring wetlands: Two Swedish case studies. Ecological Engi-
neering 4, 153–162
Grootaert C. 1998. Social Capital: The Missing Link. World Bank Social Capital Initiative Working
Paper No 5, Washington DC
Hanley N and Oglethorpe D. 1999. Toward Policies on Externalities from Agriculture: An Analysis for the
European Union. Paper presented at American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meet-
ing, Nashville, Tennessee
Hanley N, MacMillan D, Wright R E, Bullock C, Simpson I, Parrison D and Crabtree R. 1998. Con-
tingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive
areas in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics 49(1), 1–15
Harrison P F and Lederberg J (eds). 1998. Antimicrobial Resistance: Issues and Options. National Acad-
emy Press, Washington DC
Hartridge O and Pearce D. 2001. Is UK Agriculture Sustainable? Environmentally Adjusted Economic
Accounts. CSERGE, University College, London
Havelaar A M, de Wit M A S, van Kuningeveld R and van Kempen E. 2000. Health burden in the
Netherlands due to infection with thermophilic Campylobacter species. Epidemiological Infection
125, 505–522
Health and Safety Executive (HSE). 1998a. Pesticides Incidents Report 1997/8. HSE, Sudbury
HSE. 1998b. Pesticide Users and their Health: Results of HSE’s 1996/7 Feasibility Study. http://www.open.gov.
uk/hse/hsehome.htm
Heimlich R E, Wiebe K D, Claasen R, Gadsby D and House R M. 1998. Wetlands and Agriculture:
Private Interests and Public Benefits. Resource Economics Division. Economic Research Service,
USDA. Agricultural Economics Report No 765. USDA, Washington DC
Hinchcliffe F, Thompson J, Pretty J, Guijt I and Shah P (eds). 1999. Fertile Ground: The Impacts of
Participatory Watershed Development. IT Publications, London
House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities. 1999. EC Regulation of Genetic
Modification in Agriculture. HMSO, London
IATP. 1998. Farmer-managed watershed program. http://www.iatp.org
Jarass L and Obermair G M. 1997. More Jobs, Less Tax Evasion, Cleaner Environment. Universität
Regensburg, Germany. http://www.suk.fh-wiesbaden.de/personen/jarass/manuskript5.html
Kaeferstein F K, Motarjeni Y and Bettcher D W. 1997. Foodborne disease control. Emerging Infectious
Diseases 3, 503–516
Kato Y, Yokohari M and Brown R D. 1997. Integration and visualisation of the ecological value of
rural landscapes in maintaining the physical environment of Japan. Landscape and Urban Plan-
ning 39, 69–82
Keeny D and Muller M. 2000. Nitrogen and the Upper Mississippi River. Institute of Agriculture and
Trade Policy, Minneapolis

Free download pdf